Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

NLM extramural program: frequently asked questions

S Zink1, J Illes, M W Vannier

  • 1Los Alamos National Lab, New Mexico 87545, USA.

Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
|April 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A liability framework for high-risk neural devices.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Two-Eyed Seeing and other Indigenous perspectives for neuroscience.

Nature·2025
Same author

Satisfaction survey of secondary rhinoplasty among unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.

Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique·2022
Same author

Unilateral cleft nose deformities at adulthood.

Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique·2022
Same author

The arthroscopic Bankart operation: a 10-year follow-up study.

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery·2022
Same author

Augmenting lung cancer diagnosis on chest radiographs: positioning artificial intelligence to improve radiologist performance.

Clinical radiology·2021
Same journal

Further comments on the mathematical analysis of evaluating scientific journals.

Bulletin of the Medical Library Association·2010
Same journal

The medical library of St. Luke's Hospital, Chicago.

Bulletin of the Medical Library Association·2010
Same journal

Tanned human skin.

Bulletin of the Medical Library Association·2010
Same journal

A short classification of medical literature.

Bulletin of the Medical Library Association·2010
Same journal

Yellow fever in New York City.

Bulletin of the Medical Library Association·2010
Same journal

The war and the medical library.

Bulletin of the Medical Library Association·2010
See all related articles

New investigators can improve grant proposals by consulting a National Library of Medicine (NLM) frequently asked questions (FAQ) resource. This guide helps avoid common errors, enhancing proposal quality and preparation efficiency for NLM grants.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Research Funding
  • Grant Proposal Development
  • National Library of Medicine (NLM)

Background:

  • Aspiring investigators frequently encounter challenges with National Library of Medicine (NLM) grant and contract proposal processes.
  • Established researchers are familiar with the complex procedures, but these are often opaque to new applicants.
  • The NLM's Division of Extramural Programs (EP) supports various entities including medical libraries, academic centers, and industry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a clear, accessible resource for new investigators navigating NLM grant submissions.
  • To address common questions and misconceptions regarding the NLM grant application process.
  • To improve the quality and efficiency of proposal preparation for NLM funding.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compilation of frequently asked questions (FAQ) by the Biomedical Library Review Committee (BLRC).
  • Inclusion of expert advice from National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants and contracts specialists.
  • Editing and abridging content into an introductory guide for target investigators.

Main Results:

  • Development of an electronic FAQ resource addressing common issues in NLM proposal submission.
  • Expert compilation aimed at clarifying complex processes for medical library science, informatics, and biotechnology investigators.
  • Anticipated improvement in proposal quality and investigator efficiency through error avoidance.

Conclusions:

  • New investigators can enhance their grant proposal success by utilizing the NLM's FAQ resource.
  • Avoiding common mistakes identified in the FAQ leads to more effective proposal preparation.
  • The resource aims to streamline the NLM grant application process for a broader range of scientific disciplines.