Related Experiment Videos
Laboratory markers of disease activity
1Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, UK.
The Journal of Rheumatology. Supplement
|March 1, 1996
Summary
Laboratory markers in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) help monitor disease and predict prognosis. Quantitative markers track early disease, while qualitative markers like MHC conserved epitope and rheumatoid factor predict erosions and guide early therapy.
Area of Science:
- Clinical immunology
- Laboratory medicine
- Rheumatology
Background:
- Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) presents with various laboratory abnormalities.
- These markers are primarily used for disease monitoring.
- They can also offer prognostic insights and aid in clinical diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of laboratory markers in rheumatoid arthritis.
- To differentiate the roles of quantitative and qualitative markers.
- To identify markers for predicting disease progression and guiding therapy.
Main Methods:
- Review of laboratory markers associated with rheumatoid arthritis.
- Analysis of marker application in early versus established disease stages.
- Assessment of predictive value for radiological erosions.
Main Results:
- Quantitative markers are generally used for monitoring early rheumatoid arthritis.
- Qualitative markers, including MHC conserved epitope and rheumatoid factor, show strong potential for predicting radiological erosions.
- In established RA, most quantitative measures indicate a poor prognosis.
Conclusions:
- The selection of an appropriate laboratory marker is contingent upon the specific clinical question and the stage of rheumatoid arthritis.
- Qualitative markers offer valuable prognostic information, particularly for guiding early therapeutic interventions.
- Laboratory markers play a crucial role in both monitoring rheumatoid arthritis and predicting its long-term outcomes.