Related Experiment Videos
Tricuspid valve replacement subsequent to previous open heart surgery
P Hornick1, P A Harris, K M Taylor
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
The Journal of Heart Valve Disease
|January 1, 1996
Summary
Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) in patients with prior cardiac surgery is high-risk. Survivors may experience improved symptoms like reduced edema and better New York Heart Association class.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Valve Repair and Replacement
Background:
- Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is uncommon in patients without prior open-heart surgery due to earlier interventions on mitral and/or aortic valves.
- This study focuses on TVR in patients who have already undergone previous open-heart surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report the short and medium-term outcomes of bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) in patients with a history of previous open-heart surgery.
- To assess the risks and benefits associated with this high-risk procedure.
Main Methods:
- A consecutive series of 14 patients underwent bioprosthetic TVR between December 1985 and February 1993.
- All patients had at least one prior open-heart surgery; many were reoperations (first or second time).
- Patients were assessed preoperatively, and outcomes including mortality, reoperation, and functional status were tracked.
Main Results:
- Hospital mortality was high at 50% (7/14), with a higher incidence in patients with severe preoperative symptoms (NYHA class III/IV) and those undergoing second reoperations.
- No intraoperative deaths or immediate reoperations for bleeding/pacing occurred.
- Among discharged survivors (mean follow-up 46 months), 57% showed improved NYHA class, and all reported reduced peripheral edema. No valve-related complications were observed in survivors.
Conclusions:
- Tricuspid valve replacement in patients with prior cardiac surgery is a high-risk procedure with significant hospital mortality.
- Despite the risks, survivors may experience substantial clinical benefits, including improved functional capacity and reduced peripheral edema.