Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modelling clinical accelerator beams: a review

M A Ebert1, P W Hoban, P J Keall

  • 1Department of Medical Physics, Royal Adelaide Hospital, SA.

Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine
|September 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Training and assessing convolutional neural network performance in automatic vascular segmentation using Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT.

The international journal of cardiovascular imaging·2024
Same author

Preoperative stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy with postoperative conventional irradiation of soft tissue sarcomas: Protocol overview with a preliminary safety report.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2021
Same author

Pelvic organ motion and dosimetric implications during horizontal patient rotation for prostate radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2020
Same author

Towards MR-guided electron therapy: Measurement and simulation of clinical electron beams in magnetic fields.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2020
Same author

Voxel-level biological optimisation of prostate IMRT using patient-specific tumour location and clonogen density derived from mpMRI.

Radiation oncology (London, England)·2020
Same author

Standard versus hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: assessing the impact on dose modulation and normal tissue effects when using patient-specific cancer biology.

Physics in medicine and biology·2020
Same journal

A comparison between EPSON V700 and EPSON V800 scanners for film dosimetry.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

Nanodosimetric understanding to the dependence of the relationship between dose-averaged lineal energy on nanoscale and LET on ion species.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

Schizophrenia diagnosis using innovative EEG feature-level fusion schemes.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

Force decoding using local field potentials in primary motor cortex: PLS or Kalman filter regression?

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

EPSM 2019, Engineering and Physical Sciences in Medicine : 28-30 October 2019, Perth, Australia.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

New name: Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
See all related articles

Accurate radiotherapy dose calculations rely on understanding particle behavior in medical linear accelerator beams. This review examines analytical and numerical methods for modeling these radiation beams, assessing their accuracy and usefulness.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Computational Science

Background:

  • Radiotherapy dose calculation algorithms require detailed knowledge of particle characteristics in linear accelerator (LINAC) radiation beams.
  • Accurate modeling of these beams is crucial for effective radiation therapy planning and delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare analytical and numerical techniques for modeling megavoltage photon and electron beams from LINACs.
  • To assess the characteristics provided by these modeling techniques and their relative accuracy and utility in clinical applications.

Main Methods:

  • Review of published analytical methods utilizing transport results and cross sections.
  • Review of published numerical methods, including Monte Carlo techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of techniques requiring minimal interaction with the physical radiation beam.

    • Main Results:

    • Various analytical and numerical approaches exist for characterizing radiation beams.
    • These techniques offer extensive descriptions of clinical beams.
    • The accuracy and utility of different modeling approaches vary.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding particle characteristics in radiation beams is essential for advanced radiotherapy dose calculations.
    • Analytical and numerical modeling techniques provide valuable tools for beam characterization and refinement of LINAC systems.
    • The choice of modeling technique depends on the required accuracy and specific application.