Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using qualitative data for estimating construct validity of standardized measures

K J Aroian1, N Schappler-Morris

  • 1Boston College School of Nursing, USA.

Journal of Nursing Measurement
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health and social service utilization among elderly immigrants from the former Soviet Union.

Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing·2001
Same author

Immigrant women and their health.

Annual review of nursing research·2001
Same author

Somatization and depression among former Soviet immigrants.

Journal of cultural diversity·2000
Same author

Predicting psychological distress among former Soviet immigrants.

The International journal of social psychiatry·1999
Same author

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Demands of Immigration Scale.

Journal of nursing measurement·1999
Same author

Psychometric evaluation of the Russian Language version of the Resilience Scale.

Journal of nursing measurement·1997
Same journal

Turkish Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Physical Activity Correlates Questionnaire From the Social Ecological Model in University Students.

Journal of nursing measurement·2026
Same journal

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Patients' Attitude Toward Male Nurses Scale.

Journal of nursing measurement·2026
Same journal

Parallel Forms Reliability and Convergent Validity of the Filipino Version of the Revised Professional Practice Environment Scale.

Journal of nursing measurement·2026
Same journal

The Adaptation and Validation of the U.S. Version of the Belongingness Scale-Clinical Placement Experience Questionnaire for Nurses.

Journal of nursing measurement·2026
Same journal

The Fertility Belief Questionnaire: A Reliability and Validity Study Among a South African Sample.

Journal of nursing measurement·2026
Same journal

Nurse Practitioner Satisfaction Survey (20-Item Short Form): Dutch (Flemish) Adaptation and Pilot Psychometric Evaluation in Outpatient Care.

Journal of nursing measurement·2026
See all related articles

This study explored using qualitative interview data to validate standardized measures. While observer ratings showed high reliability, they often disagreed with self-ratings on the Demands of Immigration Scale.

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Qualitative Research Methods
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Standardized measures require rigorous validation.
  • Qualitative data offers a rich source for construct validation.
  • Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods can enhance measurement accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for using qualitative interview data to investigate construct validity.
  • To assess the concurrence between observer assessments of interview data and a standardized measure.
  • To examine the Demands of Immigration Scale (DI) using a multimethod validation approach.

Main Methods:

  • A multimethod validation study was conducted.
  • Observer assessments of qualitative interview data were compared to self-ratings on the Demands of Immigration Scale (DI).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Interrater reliability of the Demands of Immigration Observer Rating Scale (DI-ORS) was determined.

    • Main Results:

    • High interrater reliability (97.9% agreement) was achieved for the DI-ORS.
    • Significant disagreement was found between observer ratings (DI-ORS) and self-ratings (DI) in 5 out of 6 instances.
    • The findings indicate potential discrepancies when using qualitative data for construct validation of the DI.

    Conclusions:

    • Qualitative interview data can be used for construct validation, but requires careful methodological consideration.
    • Discrepancies between observer and self-ratings highlight the complexity of validating standardized measures.
    • Researchers should exercise caution and employ rigorous methods when integrating qualitative data for psychometric validation.