Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Open versus stereotactic breast biopsy

R C Frazee1, J W Roberts, R E Symmonds

  • 1Department of Surgery, Scott & White Clinic and Memorial Hospital, Temple, Texas 76508, USA.

American Journal of Surgery
|November 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Some Remarks on the Production of Sulphuretted Hydrogen Gas in the Alimentary Canal: And Its Effects on the System.

Provincial medical journal and retrospect of the medical sciences·2011
Same author

Successful treatment of a case of Cynanche Laryngea.

Medico-chirurgical transactions·2010
Same author

A comprehensive analysis of deletions, multiplications, and copy number variations in PARK2.

Neurology·2010
Same author

The Effects of a Belladonna Plaster.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Some Observations on the Origin of Catarrhs.

Provincial medical journal and retrospect of the medical sciences·2010
Same author

Human PON1, a biomarker of risk of disease and exposure.

Chemico-biological interactions·2010
Same journal

High and low body mass index and 90-day postoperative outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease undergoing abdominal surgery.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Women with firearm injuries: A multicenter mixed-methods study.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

SBAS presidential address: A surgeon-scientist's journey from haptic science to digital performance metrics.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Using Dr. Google and AI to stay informed.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Revealing the sex divide: Primary hyperparathyroidism across the American population.

American journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Pressure points: A pilot study using the NASA-TLX tool to measure the intensity of Acute care surgery work.

American journal of surgery·2026
See all related articles

Stereotactic breast biopsy is a less invasive alternative to open biopsy for mammographic abnormalities. Both methods show similar diagnostic accuracy, complication rates, and patient satisfaction, but stereotactic biopsy is significantly more cost-effective.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Surgical Pathology
  • Medical Economics

Background:

  • Mammographic abnormalities often require biopsy for diagnosis.
  • Stereotactic breast biopsy offers a less invasive approach compared to traditional open biopsy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic accuracy, complication rates, patient satisfaction, and costs of stereotactic breast biopsy versus open biopsy.
  • To evaluate stereotactic biopsy as a viable alternative for mammographic abnormalities.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective evaluation of 103 women with mammographic abnormalities requiring biopsy.
  • Comparison of stereotactic biopsy (n=52) and open biopsy (n=51) groups.
  • Analysis of diagnostic accuracy, complication rates, patient satisfaction surveys, and procedure costs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in malignancy detection rates (12% stereotactic vs. 13% open).
  • Low complication rates for both: 4% stereotactic (hematomas/seromas) vs. 6% open.
  • Stereotactic biopsy was significantly less expensive ($650 vs. $2400).
  • Patient satisfaction was comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions:

  • Stereotactic breast biopsy is diagnostically equivalent to open biopsy for mammographic abnormalities.
  • Complication rates and patient satisfaction are similar for both procedures.
  • Stereotactic biopsy presents a substantial cost saving over open biopsy.