Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contrast matching techniques for digital subtraction radiography: an objective evaluation

B Likar1, R Bernard, F Pernus

  • 1Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Proceedings : a Conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Monoplane 3D-2D registration of cerebral angiograms based on multi-objective stratified optimization.

Physics in medicine and biology·2017
Same author

Manual and computerized measurement of coronal vertebral inclination on MRI images: a pilot study.

Clinical radiology·2013
Same author

Quantitative vertebral morphometry based on parametric modeling of vertebral bodies in 3D.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2012
Same author

Validation for 2D/3D registration. I: A new gold standard data set.

Medical physics·2011
Same author

Efficient implementation of the rank correlation merit function for 2D/3D registration.

Physics in medicine and biology·2010
Same author

A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions.

Medical image analysis·2010

Digital subtraction radiography (DSR) effectively monitors periodontal disease and therapy outcomes. The Optical Density Thickness Function (ODTF) method minimizes contrast errors better than CDF and LSQA, enhancing subtracted image quality.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Radiology
  • Medical Imaging Analysis

Background:

  • Digital subtraction radiography (DSR) is crucial for detecting early periodontal disease and assessing treatment efficacy.
  • Minimizing alignment and contrast errors is essential for accurate DSR image analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate three contrast correction methods for reducing contrast mismatches in DSR.
  • To compare the efficacy of ODTF, CDF, and LSQA methods in contrast correction.

Main Methods:

  • In vitro study using an aluminium wedge to simulate radiographic density.
  • Application and comparison of Optical Density Thickness Function (ODTF), Cumulative Density Function (CDF), and Least Square Quadratic Approximation (LSQA) methods.
  • Analysis of contrast correction errors induced by each method.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The ODTF method demonstrated significantly less contrast correction error compared to CDF and LSQA.
  • All three methods (CDF, ODTF, LSQA) derived from reference structure density distributions can improve objective contrast enhancement.
  • The ODTF function also enables quantitative estimation of bone volume changes.

Conclusions:

  • ODTF is a superior method for contrast correction in DSR, reducing errors and improving image quality.
  • CDF, ODTF, and LSQA functions offer potential for standardizing image quality and objective contrast enhancement in DSR.
  • ODTF provides a valuable tool for quantifying bone changes in periodontal disease assessment.