Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task

Under identical viewing conditions, observers made two types of judgement about the shape of stereoscopically defined surfaces: one required an estimate of viewing distance for correct performance (e.g. setting the depth of a hemi-cylinder to equal its half-height or a dihedral angle to 90 deg), the other did not (matching the depth of, for example, sinusoidal corrugations or hemi-cylinders presented at two distances). Depth constancy for the two types of task was about 75% and 100%, respectively. We argue that observers may use a simple "direct" strategy to perform the depth matching task rather than constructing and comparing a metric representation of each surface.