Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Jurors rate RNs. Counting the costs

J L Howard1, A F Steiert, C V Deason

  • 1Western Illinois University, Macomb, USA.

Nursing Management
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Jurors

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Periprosthetic Joint Infection Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Does Postoperative Colonoscopy Increase the Risk for Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2025
Same author

A randomized controlled trial investigating the value of patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in the Canadian healthcare system.

The bone & joint journal·2019
Same author

Highly crosslinked polyethylene wear rates and acetabular component orientation: a minimum ten-year follow-up.

The bone & joint journal·2018
Same author

Knee manipulation under anaesthetic following total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort design.

The bone & joint journal·2015
Same author

Taperosis: Does head length affect fretting and corrosion in total hip arthroplasty?

The bone & joint journal·2015

Area of Science:

  • Legal Studies
  • Nursing
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • Public perception of nursing practice is crucial for understanding legal frameworks.
  • Registered nurses (RNs) operate within complex legal and ethical landscapes.
  • Assessing RNs' legal accountability requires examining real-world conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate public perception of registered nurses' legal accountability.
  • To analyze the conditions influencing RNs' legal liability.
  • To provide insights into juror perspectives on nursing legal issues.

Main Methods:

  • Survey of a juror group to gauge public opinion.
  • Examination of specific conditions faced by RNs.
  • Analysis of legal liability associated with these conditions.

Main Results:

  • Juror perspectives on RNs' legal accountability were documented.
  • Key conditions impacting RNs' liability were identified.
  • The study provides a basis for understanding public views on nursing legal standards.

Conclusions:

  • Public perception, as reflected by jurors, shapes views on nursing legal accountability.
  • Understanding the context of RNs' practice is vital for assessing their legal standing.
  • This research highlights the importance of public opinion in legal and ethical considerations for nurses.

Related Experiment Videos