Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Delayed visual feedback while learning to track a moving target

H Carnahan1, C Hall, T D Lee

  • 1Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Ontario. carnahan@healthy.uwaterloo.ca

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
|December 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford underground research facility.

Physical review letters·2014
Same author

The VANILLA sensor as a beam monitoring device for X-ray radiation therapy.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2013
Same author

Defective CD8+CD28+ regulatory T cell suppressor function in rheumatoid arthritis is restored by tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapy.

Clinical and experimental immunology·2013
Same author

Long-term mortality following bloodstream infection.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2013
Same author

Preoperative HE4 expression in plasma predicts surgical outcome in primary ovarian cancer patients: results from the OVCAD study.

Gynecologic oncology·2012
Same author

Metformin in obese children and adolescents: the MOCA trial.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2012
Same journal

Variations in Isometric Strength and Rate of Force Development Across the Menstrual and Hormonal Contraceptive Cycle in Elite Female Football Players.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

A One-Year Longitudinal Impact Tracking Study of Participation in Physical Education on Academic Achievements of Chinese High School Students From the Perspective of Development Trajectory Visualization.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

Perceived, but Not Neuromuscular, Fatigue Demonstrated After Doubles Pickleball Competitions.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

In- and Out-of-Possession Running and Technical-Tactical Performance in Soccer.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

Effect of Visual Illusion on Motor Skills Learning in Boys With Developmental Coordination Disorder: A School-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

Challenge Under Pressure Contextual Interference or Differential Learning.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
See all related articles

Delayed visual feedback in manual tracking can improve learning. While immediate feedback reduces initial errors, delayed feedback enhances long-term skill retention and transfer, suggesting its benefits for motor learning.

Area of Science:

  • Motor Control
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Manual tracking tasks are crucial for understanding motor learning.
  • The role of visual feedback timing in skill acquisition is complex.
  • Previous research suggests immediate feedback is optimal for performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of delayed visual feedback on manual tracking performance.
  • To determine if delayed feedback during practice benefits retention and transfer of motor skills.
  • To explore the relationship between feedback delay magnitude and learning outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving manual tracking tasks with varying visual feedback delays.
  • Experiment 1 compared immediate (0 ms) versus delayed (333 ms) feedback during acquisition.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2 examined six different feedback delay conditions during practice.

    • Main Results:

    • Immediate feedback led to lower error during acquisition in Experiment 1.
    • The delayed feedback group showed better performance on a transfer test in Experiment 1.
    • In Experiment 2, higher training delay generally increased error, but improved retention at a 417 ms delay.

    Conclusions:

    • Errors during the acquisition phase do not necessarily hinder overall learning.
    • Delayed visual feedback can be beneficial for motor learning, particularly for retention and transfer.
    • The optimal timing of visual feedback may depend on the specific learning or testing phase.