Unilateral brain damage, prosodic comprehension deficits, and the acoustic cues to prosody

Stimuli from two previously presented comprehension tasks of affective and linguistic prosody (Pell & Baum, 1997) were analyzed acoustically and subjected to several discriminant function analyses, following Van Lancker and Sidtis (1992). An analysis of the errors made on these tasks by left-hemisphere-damaged (LHD) and right-hemisphere-damaged (RHD) subjects examined whether each clinical group relied on specific (and potentially different) acoustic features in comprehending prosodic stimuli (Van Lancker & Sidtis, 1992). Analyses also indicated whether the brain-damaged patients tested in Pell and Baum (1997) exhibited perceptual impairments in the processing of intonation. Acoustic analyses of the utterances reaffirmed the importance of F0 cues in signaling affective and linguistic prosody. Analyses of subjects' affective misclassifications did not suggest that LHD and RHD patients were biased by different sets of the acoustic features to prosody in judging their meaning, in contrast to Van Lancker and Sidtis (1992). However, qualitative differences were noted in the ability of LHD and RHD patients to identify linguistic prosody, indicating that LHD subjects may be specifically impaired in decoding linguistically defined categorical features of prosodic patterns.