Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The immune system as a supersystem

T Tada1

  • 1Research Institute for Biological Sciences, Science University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan.

Annual Review of Immunology
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Radiation enhancing effect of pentoxifylline.

Oncology reports·2011
Same author

Usefulness of endoscopic retrograde biliary biopsy using large-capacity forceps for extrahepatic biliary strictures: a prospective randomized study.

Endoscopy·2010
Same author

Expression of cell adhesion molecules at the collapse and recovery of haematopoiesis in bone marrow of mouse.

Anatomia, histologia, embryologia·2010
Same author

Quality of portal verification radiography using EC-L film in electron beam therapy.

The British journal of radiology·2009
Same author

Silicone-induced foreign-body reaction after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty for Jaccoud's arthropathy.

Rheumatology international·2008
Same author

Successful endoscopic resection of an early carcinoma of the duodenum.

Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy·2008
Same journal

The Neuroimmune Circuitry of Peripheral Sensory Neuron Subtypes in Chronic Pain.

Annual review of immunology·2026
Same journal

The Spectrum of Fibroblast Immune Biology.

Annual review of immunology·2026
Same journal

The Molecular Logic of Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Class Switch Recombination.

Annual review of immunology·2026
Same journal

Decoding Human T Cell Immunity with Artificial Intelligence and Single-Cell Genomics.

Annual review of immunology·2026
Same journal

Immune Niches in Cancer.

Annual review of immunology·2026
Same journal

T Cell Receptor Signaling and Immune Tolerance: From Autoimmunity to Cancer Immunity.

Annual review of immunology·2026
See all related articles

This article introduces the concept of a "supersystem" to describe highly integrated biological and social networks, such as the immune system, which generate their own components and regulate themselves through internal adaptation rather than following a fixed external purpose.

Area of Science:

  • Theoretical biology and the supersystem framework
  • Systems immunology and complex adaptive networks

Background:

Biological complexity often defies simple reductionist explanations in modern science. Scholars frequently struggle to categorize systems that exhibit both internal autonomy and environmental responsiveness. Prior research has shown that mechanistic models fail to capture the emergent properties of highly integrated life processes. No prior work had resolved how systems like the immune network generate their own diverse constituents from singular origins. That uncertainty drove the need for a new conceptual framework to bridge these gaps. Existing definitions of organic wholes remain limited by their reliance on predefined functional goals. This paper addresses the theoretical void regarding self-organizing structures that determine their own developmental trajectories. The proposed model offers a novel perspective on how such entities maintain integrity while remaining open to external stimuli.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this article is to introduce the term supersystem to designate highly integrated life systems. The author seeks to distinguish these entities from traditional mechanistic systems. This study addresses the need for a framework that accounts for self-generation from a single progenitor. The research explores how diverse elements within these systems form relationships through mutual adaptation. The author investigates the mechanisms of self-regulation and self-organization in complex biological networks. This work examines the capacity of these systems to remain open to environmental signals while maintaining internal closure. The study explores the application of this concept to diverse fields including neurology and immunology. The author intends to provide a new lens for understanding the development of both natural and human-created phenomena.

Keywords:
self-organizationtheoretical biologyemergent propertiessystems theory

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that a supersystem functions through self-organization, where elements generated from a single progenitor adapt to one another. Unlike mechanistic systems with fixed goals, these entities establish their own behavioral patterns to regulate internal states and determine their future trajectory.

The authors identify the immune system, the nervous system, and embryogenesis as primary biological examples. They also suggest that human-created phenomena, such as the development of language or the growth of a city, exhibit similar characteristics of this integrated framework.

A single progenitor is necessary to generate the diverse elements that eventually form the supersystem. This origin allows the resulting components to develop relationships through mutual adaptation and coadaptation, creating a cohesive whole that is distinct from systems assembled from pre-existing, diverse parts.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

Review approach involves a theoretical synthesis of developmental and evolutionary biology principles. The author evaluates the structural characteristics of integrated life systems. This analysis contrasts mechanistic models with self-organizing frameworks. The inquiry focuses on the origin and regulation of complex networks. The author examines how these systems maintain internal coherence while interacting with external environments. This conceptual study draws parallels between physiological processes and cultural evolution. The approach integrates observations from immunology, neurology, and embryology. This methodology provides a logical basis for defining the properties of self-generating entities.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature suggest that a supersystem generates its own elements from a single progenitor. The author reports that these diverse elements form relationships through mutual adaptation and coadaptation. The results indicate that these systems create dynamic, self-regulating structures through internal self-organization. The study finds that these entities remain closed and self-satisfied while simultaneously receiving signals from the environment. The author notes that these systems transduce external inputs into internal messages to facilitate expansion. The research demonstrates that these systems lack a defined purpose, unlike traditional mechanistic models. The findings show that the immune and nervous systems function as typical examples of this framework. The author observes that the prototype for these systems is evident in both embryogenesis and evolutionary processes.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that the supersystem framework provides a robust lens for viewing biological integration. This model suggests that immune and nervous systems operate through self-established behavioral patterns rather than fixed external mandates. Synthesis and implications indicate that these entities function as closed yet environmentally responsive units. The researchers argue that this concept extends beyond biology into cultural phenomena like language and urban development. This perspective implies that self-organization is a universal feature of complex, evolving life structures. The authors conclude that such systems determine their own fate through continuous internal adaptation and coadaptation. This framework highlights the dynamic nature of self-regulating networks that emerge from singular progenitors. The study suggests that viewing these systems as supersystems clarifies their unique capacity for expansion and self-regulation.

The authors describe the role of external signals as inputs that the system transduces into internal messages. This process allows the otherwise self-satisfied, closed entity to remain open to its environment, facilitating necessary self-regulation and expansion in response to outside stimuli.

The researchers measure the system by its capacity for self-regulation and its lack of a predefined purpose. They contrast this with mechanistic systems, which are defined by their specific, externally assigned goals and the assembly of diverse, pre-existing elements into an organic whole.

The authors imply that this conceptual model provides a unified way to understand complex life processes and human cultural evolution. They propose that by recognizing these structures as supersystems, scholars can better analyze how self-organizing entities maintain integrity while adapting to their surroundings.