Differential healing and neovascularization of ePTFE implants in subcutaneous versus adipose tissue

The preclinical evaluation of polymer biocompatibility is often performed using animal subcutaneous implant models. The choice of subcutaneous tissue as the implant site is due to a number of factors including simplicity of the surgery involved. Results from subcutaneous implants cannot necessarily be extrapolated to other tissues due to the differences in cellular composition of tissues. We have evaluated and compared the healing characteristics of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) discs implanted in either subcutaneous tissue or epididymal fat pad tissue in rats. Following 3 and 5 weeks of implantation, the healing characteristics of discs were evaluated histologically with particular emphasis on tissue and polymer neovascularization. Implants placed in subcutaneous tissue exhibited limited formation of new microvascular elements within and directly in contact with the polymer, and the formation of an extensive fibrous capsule. In contrast, ePTFE implanted in the epididymal fat pads of rats exhibited extensive neovascularization of tissue surrounding the polymer, penetration of these microvascular cells into the graft interstices for distances < or = 100 microns and no morphological evidence of a fibrous capsule. The rat epididymal fat pad provides an alternative tissue for polymer healing evaluations. Due to the extensive presence of fat in subcutaneous tissue in humans, we suggest the fat pad model provides a more relevant preclinical evaluation of the healing characteristics of polymers used clinically in anatomic positions which contain significant amounts of fat.