Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
Published on: June 12, 2017
Comparison of the test-retest reliability of the Work Box using three administrative methods
L Speller1, J A Trollinger, P A Maurer
1Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
The second revised Work Box instructions show the highest test-retest reliability, making them the recommended standard for assessing manual dexterity. This improved method is best suited for men with prior experience in such tasks.
Area of Science:
- Occupational therapy
- Rehabilitation medicine
- Human factors engineering
Background:
- The Work Box is a tool used to assess manual dexterity.
- Standardizing assessment methods is crucial for reliable results.
- Previous versions of the Work Box instructions had varying reliability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the test-retest reliability of three administrative methods for the Work Box.
- To identify the most reliable set of instructions for Work Box administration.
Main Methods:
- Sixty subjects without disabilities were randomly assigned to one of three instruction groups (20 per group).
- The Work Box assessment was administered twice to each subject, with a 7-14 day interval between tests.
- Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine test-retest reliability.
Main Results:
- The second revised instructions yielded the highest ICCs for assembly (.781), disassembly (.579), and total scores (.717).
- Reliability was higher for men compared to women.
- Subjects with more experience in manual dexterity tasks showed higher reliability.
Conclusions:
- The second revised Work Box instructions are recommended as the standard administrative method due to superior reliability.
- The assessment appears most appropriate for men with existing manual dexterity experience.
- Further standardization could establish the Work Box as a valuable tool in industrial rehabilitation settings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Kruskal-Wallis Test
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Self-Report Tests of Personality

