Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Critical social theory as a grounded process

V E Fleming1, J A Moloney

  • 1Department of Nursing and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland. V.Fleming@gcal.ac.uk

International Journal of Nursing Practice
|September 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Women-with-midwives-with-women: a model of interdependence.

Midwifery·1998
Same author

Women and midwives in partnership: a problematic relationship?

Journal of advanced nursing·1998
Same author

Autonomous or automatons? An exploration through history of the concept of autonomy in midwifery in Scotland and New Zealand.

Nursing ethics·1998
Same author

Midwifery in New Zealand: responding to changing times.

Health care for women international·1996
Same author

Client education: a futuristic outlook.

Journal of advanced nursing·1992

This study defends critical social science research methods, addressing common criticisms by detailing the authors' own research journey. Properly executed critical social science research provides a strong foundation for nursing and midwifery practice.

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Nursing Research
  • Midwifery Research

Background:

  • Critical social science research faces common criticisms.
  • This article addresses these criticisms by examining the research process.
  • It compares critical social science with interpretative methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To rebut common criticisms of critical social science research.
  • To outline similarities and differences between critical social science and interpretative methodologies.
  • To establish the value of critical social science in nursing and midwifery.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of the authors' own research projects.
  • Comparative analysis of critical social science and interpretative methodologies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of key research stages: study area selection, researcher-participant relationships, ethics, data collection, and analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Common criticisms of critical social science research can be rebutted through careful methodological application.
    • Similarities and differences with interpretative methodologies were identified across key research stages.
    • The authors' research trail demonstrates the robustness of critical social science.

    Conclusions:

    • Critically social science research, when correctly executed, is firmly grounded in all stages.
    • This rigorous approach provides a solid foundation for evidence-based nursing and midwifery practice.
    • The study validates the utility and integrity of critical social science in healthcare research.