Related Experiment Videos
In-flight oral endotracheal intubation
T Harrison1, S H Thomas, S K Wedel
1Boston MedFlight, MA 02210-1995, USA.
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
|October 23, 1997
Summary
Aeromedical emergency medical services (EMS) endotracheal intubation (ETI) is highly successful in-flight. In-flight ETI success rates are comparable to hospital and trauma scene intubations.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Aeromedical Services
- Critical Care
Background:
- Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a critical procedure in emergency medical services (EMS).
- Assessing ETI success rates in various pre-hospital and in-hospital settings is crucial for patient care.
- Aeromedical services face unique challenges during in-flight procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the success rates of endotracheal intubation (ETI) performed by aeromedical emergency medical services (EMS) crews during flight.
- To compare in-flight ETI success rates with those achieved in hospital and trauma scene settings.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of patients undergoing flight crew ETI over a 3-year period.
- Classification of ETI attempts into in-flight, hospital (referring), and ground (trauma scene) settings.
- Analysis of success rates, patient demographics, and interventions across different settings.
Main Results:
- A total of 302 patients underwent ETI by flight crews, with an overall success rate of 96.4%.
- In-flight ETI success rate was 94.2%, comparable to hospital (96.8%) and ground (98.3%) settings (P = .22).
- No significant differences were observed in pediatric patient proportions or multiple intubation attempts across groups.
Conclusions:
- Endotracheal intubation (ETI) by aeromedical crews is highly successful in-flight.
- In-flight ETI success rates are statistically similar to those in hospital and trauma scene settings.
- The study supports the efficacy of in-flight ETI within the studied aeromedical service.