Related Experiment Videos
Corneal endothelial changes after divide and conquer versus chip and flip phacoemulsification
P Kosrirukvongs1, S G Slade, R G Berkeley
1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|November 14, 1997
Summary
The divide and conquer phacoemulsification technique resulted in less endothelial cell loss and hexagonal cell changes compared to chip and flip phacoemulsification, particularly at one month post-surgery.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Surgical Techniques
- Corneal Science
Background:
- Phacoemulsification is a common cataract surgery method.
- Evaluating the impact of different phacoemulsification techniques on corneal health is crucial.
- Central corneal endothelial cells and thickness are key indicators of corneal health post-surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of divide and conquer (D/C) versus chip and flip (C/F) phacoemulsification on central corneal endothelial cells.
- To assess changes in corneal thickness following D/C and C/F phacoemulsification.
- To determine the safety and efficacy of these two phacoemulsification methods regarding corneal integrity.
Main Methods:
- Randomized comparison of D/C and C/F phacoemulsification in 41 eyes.
- All eyes received a foldable silicone intraocular lens.
- Corneal endothelial cell counts and thickness were measured preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in patient demographics or surgical parameters between groups.
- The chip and flip (C/F) group showed greater endothelial cell loss at 1 month.
- Significant changes in hexagonal cells were observed: 1.1% increase in D/C group vs. 10.7% decrease in C/F group at 1 week.
Conclusions:
- The divide and conquer technique demonstrated superior outcomes in preserving corneal endothelial cells and minimizing hexagonal cell alterations compared to chip and flip.
- While initial differences were significant, they were not statistically significant at the 3-month follow-up.
- Both techniques are viable, but D/C may offer better short-term corneal protection.