Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamic reliability models with conditional proportional hazards

M Hollander1, E A Peña

  • 1Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee 32306, USA.

Lifetime Data Analysis
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HFpEF prevalence among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting: A matter of definitions (Early-HFpEF cohort profile).

Primary care diabetes·2026
Same author

Mismatch between self-perceived and calculated cardiometabolic disease risk among participants in a prevention program for cardiometabolic disease: a cross-sectional study.

BMC public health·2020
Same author

Changes in the expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide after exposure to injurious stretch-shortening contractions.

Experimental gerontology·2016
Same author

Deficiency of Kruppel-like factor KLF4 in myeloid-derived suppressor cells inhibits tumor pulmonary metastasis in mice accompanied by decreased fibrocytes.

Oncogenesis·2014
Same author

Unrecognized myocardial infarction and the risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study.

Neurology·2006
Same author

Renal transplantation in the elderly--the Irish experience.

Irish journal of medical science·2005
Same journal

Shared frailty sieve estimation for dependent left truncated and interval censored data.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Functional win-fractions regression models for composite outcomes.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Variable selection in causal semiparametric transformation models with all-or-nothing treatment compliance.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Correction to: A uniformisation-driven algorithm for inference-related estimation of a phase-type ageing model.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Unobserved heterogeneity in threshold regression based on the hitting times of a reflected Brownian motion for recurrent hypoglycemia.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Variable selection with broken adaptive ridge regression for interval-censored competing risks data.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
See all related articles

This study explores dynamic stochastic modeling for reliability systems, focusing on how component failures alter system structure and remaining component lifetimes. New distribution functions are derived for jump times in dynamically modeled systems.

Area of Science:

  • Reliability Engineering
  • Stochastic Processes
  • System Dynamics

Background:

  • Traditional reliability models often assume static system structures.
  • Component failures can dynamically alter the operational structure and failure characteristics of remaining components.
  • Existing models may not fully capture the impact of component degradation and load-sharing on system lifetime.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore a dynamic approach to stochastic modeling of reliability systems.
  • To investigate the stochastic characteristics of jump times in dynamically modeled systems.
  • To derive new distribution functions for jump times in various system configurations.

Main Methods:

  • Developing a dynamic modeling framework where system structure changes upon component failure.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing the stochastic properties of jump times in these dynamic models.
  • Deriving exact distribution functions for jump times in Markov dynamic models for general coherent, parallel, and series-parallel systems.

    • Main Results:

    • Introduced a dynamic approach to stochastic reliability modeling.
    • Characterized the stochastic properties of jump times in dynamically modeled systems.
    • Derived a new family of distribution functions for jump times in general coherent, parallel, and series-parallel systems.

    Conclusions:

    • The dynamic modeling approach provides a more realistic representation of reliability systems, especially those with load-sharing or multivariate failures.
    • Understanding jump time distributions is crucial for predicting overall system lifetime.
    • The derived distribution functions offer valuable tools for analyzing dynamically modeled reliability systems.