Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Other considerations in selecting a support surface

R Jay1

  • 1RIK Medical, Boulder, Colo., USA.

Advances in Wound Care : the Journal for Prevention and Healing
|February 5, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Beyond basic pressure ulcer prevention, clinicians must consider over 30 factors when choosing support surfaces. These include cost, patient care, psychosocial needs, safety, and logistics for optimal patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cerebral vein thrombosis and right foot ischemia in a 21-year-old man.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2003
Same author

MRI diagnosis of bilateral adrenal vein thrombosis.

The British journal of radiology·2003
Same author

Suturing in A + E.

Professional nurse (London, England)·1999
Same author

Reassuring and reducing anxiety in seriously injured patients: a study of accident and emergency interventions.

Accident and emergency nursing·1996
Same author

Pressure and shear: their effects on support surface choice.

Ostomy/wound management·1995
Same author

A low-molecular-weight heparinoid compared with unfractionated heparin in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. A randomized, double-blind study.

Annals of internal medicine·1992

Area of Science:

  • Medical Devices
  • Patient Care
  • Clinical Practice

Background:

  • Seven basic requirements exist for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment support surfaces.
  • Numerous additional factors influence the selection of appropriate support surfaces for individual patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of considering over 30 additional factors beyond basic requirements when selecting patient support surfaces.
  • To categorize these additional factors for a comprehensive approach to support surface selection.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and expert consensus on support surface selection criteria.
  • Categorization of over 30 factors into five key areas: cost-effectiveness, patient care, psychosocial issues, safety/reliability, and equipment logistics.

Main Results:

  • Identified five major categories of additional factors influencing support surface selection: cost-effectiveness, patient care, psychosocial issues (comfort, satisfaction), safety/reliability/service, and equipment/logistics.
  • Emphasized that these factors are crucial for meeting individual patient needs beyond basic support surface requirements.

Conclusions:

  • Effective pressure ulcer prevention and treatment require a holistic approach to support surface selection, integrating clinical, logistical, and patient-centered considerations.
  • Future research should expand beyond wound outcomes to evaluate these broader factors in support surface effectiveness.

Related Experiment Videos