Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Revisiting the effect compartment through timing errors in drug administration

P Nony1, M Cucherat, J P Boissel

  • 1Division of Pharmacology, Cardiovascular Hospital, Lyon, France.

Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
|April 29, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of a methionine starvation based anti-cancer drug.

Medical & biological engineering & computing·2023
Same author

Publication bias in pharmacogenetics of adverse reaction to antiseizure drugs: An umbrella review and a meta-epidemiological study.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Determination of the optimal dose of ephedrine in the treatment of arterial hypotension due to general anesthesia in neonates and infants below 6 months old: the ephedrine study protocol for a randomized, open-label, controlled, dose escalation trial.

Trials·2021
Same author

Twice- or Once-Daily Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thrombosis research·2020
Same author

Dynamical modeling of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the early stage of septic shock.

In silico biology·2020
Same author

Association between difference in blood pressure reduction and risk of cardiovascular events in a type 2 diabetes population: A meta-regression analysis.

Diabetes & metabolism·2019
Same journal

Targeting developmental reprogramming: hPSC insights for cancer interception.

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
Same journal

July 2026 issue first authors.

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
Same journal

Chronobiomaterials for circadian-aligned brain therapeutics.

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
Same journal

Biosensors for translatable GPCR bias.

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
Same journal

ECM stiffness and epigenetics in organ fibrosis.

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
Same journal

Which HTT transcript to lower?

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Timing errors in drug intake cause different pharmacological effects depending on whether the drug acts via an effect compartment or directly from the central compartment. An effect compartment model can dampen pharmacokinetic variability, aiding drug prescription.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Drug Modeling

Background:

  • Drug intake timing errors can significantly alter pharmacological effects.
  • Understanding how drug kinetics influence effects is crucial for safe and effective prescribing.
  • Two distinct pharmacokinetic models exist: direct central compartment and effect compartment models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the impact of dosing timing variability on drug effects for two different pharmacokinetic models.
  • To evaluate how an effect compartment model influences pharmacokinetic variability compared to a direct central compartment model.
  • To assess the implications of these findings for drug prescription recommendations.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles for two drugs with identical concentration-effect relationships.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varied the interval between drug doses to introduce timing errors.
  • Analyzed the resulting variations in mean pharmacological effects for each model.

    • Main Results:

    • For identical central compartment concentration variability, the mean effects differed between the two models.
    • A large variability in dosing intervals led to dampened pharmacokinetic variability within the central compartment when using an effect compartment model.
    • The effect compartment model demonstrated a stabilizing influence on drug effects despite fluctuations in drug concentration.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of pharmacokinetic model significantly influences the variability of drug effects when timing errors occur.
    • Models incorporating an effect compartment can mitigate the impact of pharmacokinetic variability, particularly with inconsistent dosing intervals.
    • This modeling approach can inform safer drug prescription practices, especially for medications with narrow therapeutic indices.