Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multiple-location access in vision: evidence from illusory line motion

W C Schmidt1, B D Fisher, Z W Pylyshyn

  • 1Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. wcs@or.psychology.dal.ca

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|April 29, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Illusory line motion (ILM) experiments show that Z. W. Pylyshyn

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of competence theories in cognitive psychology.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2013
Same author

Evidence against a speed limit in multiple-object tracking.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2008
Same author

Distance learning in graduate health administration education: a case study from Washington State University.

The Journal of health administration education·2007
Same author

Attentional momentum does not underlie the inhibition of return effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2002
Same author

Presentation accuracy of Web animation methods.

Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc·2001
Same author

Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision.

Cognition·2001

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Illusory line motion (ILM) is a visual phenomenon where static lines appear to move.
  • Understanding ILM provides insights into spatial indexing and attentional mechanisms.
  • FINST (FINures of INSTantaneous) theory and unitary attention models offer competing explanations for visual processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically contrast Pylyshyn's FINST theory with unitary attention models using ILM.
  • To investigate the capacity limitations and spatial indexing capabilities of visual attention.
  • To determine which theoretical framework better predicts observed ILM phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted four experiments with undergraduate participants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized multiple-onset stimuli to induce ILM at noncontiguous spatial locations.
  • Manipulated line-drawing speed and stimulus number; analyzed modeling results and location reporting accuracy.

    • Main Results:

    • Decreased ILM observed with increased line-drawing speed, aligning with gradient explanations.
    • Capacity limitations (5-7 locations) identified for eliciting ILM.
    • Parallel access to 2-5 display locations demonstrated when reporting stimuli exhibiting illusory motion.

    Conclusions:

    • Experimental findings strongly support the predictions of FINST theory.
    • Results contradict the predictions of broad classes of unitary attention models.
    • Evidence suggests parallel processing of spatial locations within visual attention.