Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological issues in assertive community treatment studies

G J McHugo1, W Hargreaves, R E Drake

  • 1Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH, USA. Gregory.McHugo@Dartmouth.edu

The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
|May 20, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International growth of individual placement and support.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2020
Same author

Measuring Fidelity to Evidence-Based Practices: Psychometrics.

Administration and policy in mental health·2020
Same author

The Family Psychoeducation Fidelity Scale: Psychometric Properties.

Administration and policy in mental health·2020
Same author

Measuring implementation: development of the implementation process assessment tool (IPAT).

BMC health services research·2019
Same author

New directions for psychiatric rehabilitation in the USA.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2016
Same author

Employment and educational outcomes in early intervention programmes for early psychosis: a systematic review.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2014
Same journal

Mental health in asylum-seeking parents: Dynamics of fragmentation, resilience, and empowerment.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
Same journal

Exploring the role of schools during prolonged crisis: Lessons learned from an armed conflict in Israel.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
Same journal

Exploring the role of critical consciousness on complex trauma for adopted adults.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
Same journal

"When I saw his face, I recognized him": Visibility, complexity, and therapeutic negotiation of LGBTQ+ identity disclosure in social work practice.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
Same journal

Parenting and social support: Caregiver strain in social context for low-income Black mothers.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
Same journal

From involuntary dependence to resilient agency: First wartime responses and evacuation experiences of people with disabilities in Israel.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·2026
See all related articles

Research on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) programs shows mixed results, often blamed on methodological issues. This paper addresses theory and methodology to improve ACT research quality.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Behavioral Science
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Recent evaluations of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) programs yield inconsistent findings.
  • Methodological limitations are frequently cited as a reason for the lack of positive outcomes in ACT research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss theoretical and methodological issues pertinent to enhancing ACT research.
  • To highlight key areas for improvement in ACT program evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and theoretical analysis of research methodologies in ACT.
  • Focus on critical examination of sampling strategies, process evaluation, measurement tools, and data analysis techniques.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identified significant theoretical and methodological challenges impacting ACT research.
  • Highlighted specific areas such as sampling, process evaluation, measurement, and data analysis require focused attention.
  • Conclusions:

    • Addressing identified theoretical and methodological issues is crucial for advancing the scientific rigor of ACT research.
    • Improved research practices will lead to more reliable and valid findings regarding ACT program effectiveness.