Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The language of outcomes

B M Jennings1, N Staggers

  • 1Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington, USA.

ANS. Advances in Nursing Science
|May 22, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Understanding outcomes is crucial for evaluating healthcare quality and accountability. This study clarifies outcomes terminology to improve its effective use in practice.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Debunking health IT usability myths.

Applied clinical informatics·2013
Same author

Usability Evaluation of An Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) Application.

Applied clinical informatics·2013
Same author

Using a web-based prototype and human-computer interaction concepts to develop a vision for a next generation patient care management system.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2002
Same author

The role of research in the policy puzzle: nurse staffing research as a case in point.

Research in nursing & health·2001
Same author

Informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice.

The Journal of nursing education·2001
Same author

Misconceptions among nurses about evidence-based practice.

Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing·2001

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Health Outcomes Research
  • Medical Terminology

Background:

  • Outcomes are vital for assessing healthcare quality, effectiveness, and professional accountability.
  • Current terminology surrounding outcomes lacks clarity and precision.
  • This ambiguity hinders the full realization of outcomes' potential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and address the confusion in current outcomes terminology.
  • To initiate the development of a standardized outcomes lexicon.
  • To advocate for greater precision in the language used to describe outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review to identify existing terminology and points of confusion.
  • Analysis of common terms and their varied interpretations.
  • Development of a foundational outcomes lexicon.

Main Results:

  • Significant inconsistencies and ambiguities in the use of outcomes terminology were identified.
  • A preliminary outcomes lexicon was established.
  • The need for a universally accepted and precise language for outcomes was highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • Clear and precise outcomes terminology is essential for effective quality evaluation and accountability.
  • Further collaborative efforts are required to refine and expand the outcomes lexicon.
  • Standardizing outcomes language will enhance research, practice, and policy development.

Related Experiment Videos