Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is dynamical systems modeling just curve fitting?

D A Rosenbaum1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Motor Control
|June 30, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence and Incidence of Microhemorrhages in Adolescent Football Players.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2020
Same author

Injury risk due to collisions in Major League Baseball.

International journal of sports medicine·2014
Same author

Rule use in character classification: Are serial and parallel processing discrete?

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Estimation of injury simulation in international men's soccer.

International journal of sports medicine·2010
Same author

Finding final postures.

Journal of motor behavior·2009
Same author

Variation in injury risk over the course of a two-day youth club soccer tournament.

Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention·2009
Same journal

Interplay Between Postural Stability and Coordination in Female Soccer Players With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Motor control·2026
Same journal

Muscle Synergies During Countermovement Jump: Comparing Athletes and Nonathletes.

Motor control·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Mental and Muscular Fatigue on Movement Variability in Dart Throwing: A UCM Analysis.

Motor control·2026
Same journal

Working Together: Synergistic Predictors of Dyadic Performance in a Shared Force-Production Task.

Motor control·2026
Same journal

Reliability and Diurnal-Fatigability Effects on Force-Time Characteristics During Maximal Voluntary Handgrip Contractions.

Motor control·2026
Same journal

Restricting the Center of Mass Motion Via Multisegment Versus Localized Constraints: Its Impact on the Center of Pressure Behavior.

Motor control·2026
See all related articles

New mathematical tools help describe complex behaviors in dynamical systems. However, true progress requires identifying underlying mechanisms, not just fitting curves.

Area of Science:

  • Dynamical Systems Theory
  • Mathematical Modeling
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Mathematical tools have advanced the characterization of dynamical systems.
  • This progress risks becoming mere curve fitting without deeper mechanistic understanding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of identifying common mechanisms in dynamical systems.
  • To caution against curve fitting as the sole outcome of dynamical systems analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of dynamical systems theory.
  • Review of the criteria for robust scientific progress in characterizing system behaviors.

Main Results:

  • Mathematical modeling enables novel characterization of system behaviors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Failure to identify shared mechanisms across similar dynamical regimes leads to superficial analysis.

    • Conclusions:

    • Progress in dynamical systems requires linking mathematical descriptions to underlying physical, biological, or psychological mechanisms.
    • Distinguishing between systems based on shared mechanisms is crucial for advancing scientific understanding beyond curve fitting.