Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone replacement grafts. The bone substitutes

M E Aichelmann-Reidy1, R A Yukna

  • 1Department of Periodontics, University of Maryland, College of Dental Surgery, Baltimore, USA.

Dental Clinics of North America
|August 13, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy of calculus removal from furcations using a Fissurotomy Bur in vitro.

The Journal of the Western Society of Periodontology/Periodontal abstracts·2007
Same author

An economic evaluation of a chlorhexidine chip for treating chronic periodontitis: the CHIP (chlorhexidine in periodontitis) study.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2002
Same author

Clinical comparison of microporous biocompatible composite of PMMA, PHEMA and calcium hydroxide grafts and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes in human mandibular molar Class II furcations. A case series.

Journal of periodontology·2001
Same author

Clinical evaluation of acellular allograft dermis for the treatment of human gingival recession.

Journal of periodontology·2001
Same author

Gingival, dermal, and periodontal ligament fibroblasts express different extracellular matrix receptors.

Journal of periodontology·2001
Same author

Collagen membrane resorption in dogs: a comparative study.

Implant dentistry·2001
Same journal

Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma: A Dental Perspective.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Expanding Role of Virtual Surgical Planning in Maxillofacial Trauma Management.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Revision Surgery for Occlusal Correction in Facial Trauma.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Mandibular Condylar Fractures and Occlusal Management.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Occlusion Management in Facial Trauma: A Literature Review.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Dental Implants in Rehabilitation of Patients with Facial Trauma: a Review of Most Current Practices.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Bone substitutes are key for periodontal regeneration, offering a scaffold for new bone growth. Clinical studies show similar bone regeneration outcomes compared to other graft types.

Area of Science:

  • Periodontal regeneration
  • Biomaterials science
  • Oral surgery

Background:

  • Bone substitutes are synthetically derived or xenografts, serving as alternatives to autogenous or allogeneic bone grafts.
  • These materials are osteoconductive, providing a scaffold for bone deposition, but lack osteoinductive properties.
  • Periodontal osseous defects present a significant clinical challenge in regenerative dentistry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of bone substitutes in periodontal regeneration.
  • To compare the outcomes of bone substitutes with other bone grafting materials.
  • To assess the role of bone substitutes in improving clinical parameters for periodontal defects.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical studies comparing bone substitutes to flap debridement alone.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of histologic outcomes for bone substitutes, autogenous grafts, and allografts.
  • Comparison of clinical probing depth and attachment level changes across different graft types.

    • Main Results:

    • Bone substitutes demonstrate significant decreases in clinical probing depth and attachment levels compared to flap debridement alone.
    • Histologic outcomes show reported differences among bone substitutes, autogenous grafts, and allografts.
    • Overall, probing depth reduction and attachment level gains are comparable across all bone replacement grafts, including bone substitutes.

    Conclusions:

    • Bone substitutes are effective in periodontal regeneration, offering comparable clinical outcomes to traditional bone grafts.
    • These materials serve as a crucial osteoconductive scaffold for new bone formation in periodontal defects.
    • Further research into histologic differences may refine the application of various bone graft materials in periodontology.