Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Time-of-flight PET

T K Lewellen1

  • 1Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle 98195-6004, USA.

Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
|August 15, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Early Time-of-Flight (TOF) positron emission tomographs (PET) offered high count-rate imaging but lacked spatial resolution. New scintillators may revive TOF PET technology for future medical imaging applications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of event position reconstruction in monolithic crystals that are optically coupled.

Physics in medicine and biology·2016
Same author

FPGA-Based Pulse Pile-Up Correction With Energy and Timing Recovery.

IEEE transactions on nuclear science·2013
Same author

FPGA-Based Pulse Pileup Correction.

IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium·2012
Same author

Evolution of the Design of a Second Generation FireWire Based Data Acquisition System.

IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium·2012
Same author

Effective count rates for PET scanners with reduced and extended axial field of view.

Physics in medicine and biology·2011
Same author

An 8×8 Row-Column Summing Readout Electronics for Preclinical Positron Emission Tomography Scanners.

IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium·2010
Same journal

Letter from the Editors.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Expanding Horizons: The Role of Kaleidoscope and Relevant Images in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

The diagnostic performance and clinical value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in pleural mesothelioma - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Feasibility of treating neuroendocrine prostate cancer with anti-SSTR radioligands: A systematic review of imaging and treatment studies.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

<sup>18</sup>F-FDG -PET/CT in cardiac sarcoidosis: Diagnosis, therapy monitoring, and future directions.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Maximizing diagnostic yield: A systematic review and deep dive into PSMA PET scan protocol variations for prostate cancer.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Physics

Background:

  • Time-of-Flight (TOF) positron emission tomographs (PET) emerged in the 1980s and early 1990s.
  • Initial research in 1980 explored TOF's potential for improved signal-to-noise ratios.
  • Key institutions like Washington University and CEA-LETI pioneered early TOF tomograph development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the historical development and limitations of early Time-of-Flight PET systems.
  • To assess the potential for reviving TOF PET technology with advancements in scintillator materials.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of Time-of-Flight PET system development.
  • Analysis of performance characteristics, including signal-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution, and sensitivity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of scintillator material properties and their impact on TOF imaging.

    • Main Results:

    • Early TOF PET systems, like Super PETT I, were optimized for high count-rate imaging of short-lived radiotracers.
    • Bismuth Germanate (BGO)-based scanners eventually offered superior spatial resolution compared to TOF systems.
    • TOF systems faced challenges with lower intrinsic sensitivity and were largely discontinued by the early 1990s.

    Conclusions:

    • Despite initial limitations, advancements in scintillator technology (higher light output, density, and speed) create renewed interest in TOF PET.
    • Future TOF tomograph designs may overcome previous resolution and sensitivity drawbacks.
    • TOF techniques hold promise for enhancing future medical imaging capabilities.