Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validation of haplotype frequency estimation methods

R F Schipper1, J D'Amaro, P de Lange

  • 1Department of Immunohematology & Blood Bank, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands.

Human Immunology
|August 26, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual prognosis in immunocompetent patients with herpes zoster ophthalmicus.

Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica·2003
Same author

Histocompatibility and corneal transplantation.

Developments in ophthalmology·2002
Same author

The HLA Dictionary 2001: a summary of HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1/3/4/5 and -DQB1 alleles and their association with serologically defined HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR and -DQ antigens.

European journal of immunogenetics : official journal of the British Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics·2002
Same author

Human leukocyte antigen-DQ and DR polymorphisms predict rheumatoid arthritis outcome better than DR alone.

Human immunology·2001
Same author

Six microsatellite markers on the short arm of chromosome 6 in relation to HLA-DR3 and TNF-308A in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Genes and immunity·2001
Same author

The HLA Dictionary 2001: a summary of HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1/3/4/5, -DQB1 alleles and their association with serologically defined HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR and -DQ antigens.

Tissue antigens·2001
Same journal

The functional relevance of human leukocyte antigens in the development of cord blood derived advanced cellular therapies: A new direction of public cord blood banks.

Human immunology·2026
Same journal

From educational to graded: redefining proficiency testing in ABO genotyping.

Human immunology·2026
Same journal

Recurrent spontaneous abortion: integrated bioinformatics and histological validation identify FURIN and NEDD4 as ferroptosis-associated endometrial markers.

Human immunology·2026
Same journal

A perspective on ABO incompatible transplantation.

Human immunology·2026
Same journal

Classical HLA allele and haplotype frequency estimates in US populations.

Human immunology·2026
Same journal

High KIR diversity in Uganda and Botswana children living with HIV.

Human immunology·2026
See all related articles

Three methods for estimating haplotype frequencies from unrelated individuals were compared. While all methods accurately estimated common haplotypes, the maximum likelihood method demonstrated the best performance for predicting less frequent haplotypes.

Area of Science:

  • Population genetics
  • Immunogenetics
  • Statistical genetics

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of haplotype frequencies is crucial for genetic association studies and understanding population genetic structure.
  • Traditional methods often rely on family pedigree data, which can be resource-intensive to collect.
  • Developing reliable methods for estimating haplotype frequencies from unrelated individuals is essential for large-scale genetic analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of three distinct statistical methods for estimating haplotype frequencies using unrelated individuals.
  • To compare the accuracy of these estimation methods against a gold standard derived from family pedigree data.
  • To identify the most reliable method for haplotype frequency estimation, particularly for both common and rare haplotypes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) phenotype data from 1040 families.
  • Employed three estimation methods: Mattiuz et al.'s two-by-two tables, Yasuda and Tsuji's maximum likelihood method, and a crude homozygosity-based method.
  • Compared estimation results against haplotypes directly deduced from complete family pedigree information.

Main Results:

  • All tested estimation methods provided reliable frequencies for common haplotypes.
  • Performance degraded for less frequent haplotypes across all estimation methods.
  • The maximum likelihood estimation method exhibited the highest overall correlation with haplotype frequencies derived from family pedigrees.

Conclusions:

  • The maximum likelihood method offers superior accuracy for haplotype frequency estimation compared to the other evaluated methods, especially for less frequent haplotypes.
  • Haplotype frequency estimation from unrelated individuals is feasible but requires careful method selection, particularly when rare variants are of interest.
  • Further refinement of statistical methods is needed to improve the accuracy of rare haplotype frequency estimation.