Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sociometric classification methods in school peer groups: a comparative investigation

N L Frederickson1, A F Furnham

  • 1Department of Psychology, University College London, UK. n.frederickson@ucl.ac.uk

Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines
|October 3, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The long-term stability of sociometric status classification: a longitudinal study of included pupils who have moderate learning difficulties and their mainstream peers.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2001
Same author

Accurate knowledge about suicide.

Psychological reports·2000
Same author

Use of sociometric techniques to assess the social status of mainstreamed children with learning difficulties.

Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs·1998
Same author

MMPI profiles of male and female migraine sufferers.

Social science & medicine (1982)·1993
Same author

Medical students' beliefs about nine different specialties.

British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·1986
Same journal

Prediction versus explanation of preadolescents' psychopathology: environmental data predict while brain measures moderate effects.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2026
Same journal

Co-development of ADHD symptoms and emotional problems from childhood to adulthood: predictors and developmental outcomes.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2026
Same journal

Individualized EEG functional connectivity predicts clinical symptoms in ADHD, dyslexia, and their comorbidity.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2026
Same journal

Mechanism-based subtypes of problematic use of the internet and corresponding neurobehavioral characteristics among children and adolescents.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2026
Same journal

Personally meaningful life events from adolescence to young adulthood: a longitudinal natural language processing analysis.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2026
Same journal

A double-blind randomized controlled trial of personalized upper-alpha neurofeedback in children with ADHD.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2026
See all related articles

Different sociometric classification methods show poor agreement and temporal stability in classifying children (aged 9-12). This highlights the need for theoretically grounded approaches in peer assessment for clinical use.

Area of Science:

  • Child Psychology
  • Social Dynamics
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Sociometric methods are crucial for understanding social dynamics in children.
  • Previous research has not comprehensively evaluated the psychometric properties of various classification techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the categorical consequences and psychometric properties of diverse sociometric classification methods.
  • To assess the agreement and temporal stability of these methods in a child population.

Main Methods:

  • 13 different sociometric analysis methods were applied to data from 254 children (aged 9-12).
  • Data collection occurred across two time points, 5 weeks apart, including sociometric questionnaires and peer assessment.
  • MANOVA was used to assess construct validity based on social exchange theory.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Analysis revealed relatively poor agreement among the 13 sociometric classification methods.
  • Temporal stability of the classifications over the 5-week period was also found to be poor.
  • Cross-sex rating biases and challenges with classifying 'neglected' and 'controversial' children were identified.

Conclusions:

  • Existing sociometric classification methods exhibit significant limitations in reliability and validity.
  • There is a need for theoretically informed approaches that consider the broader peer social system.
  • Caution is advised when selecting sociometric methods for clinical applications due to psychometric weaknesses.