Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Identifying global anatomical differences: deformation-based morphometry

J Ashburner1, C Hutton, R Frackowiak

  • 1Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, London, UK. j.ashburner@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk

Human Brain Mapping
|October 27, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Co-design of a Mobile Stroke Unit pathway highlights uncertainties and trade-offs for viable system-wide implementation in the English and Welsh NHS.

BMC emergency medicine·2025
Same author

Modification and validation of the Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire (WHQ) for assessing surgical site infection in wounds healing by secondary intention.

Journal of tissue viability·2025
Same author

A simple trick for supinated hand positioning during hand surgery.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2025
Same author

Lesion network mapping of REM Sleep Behaviour Disorder.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2025
Same author

The modes and competing rates of cartilage fluid loss and recovery.

Acta biomaterialia·2021
Same author

Range-of-motion affects cartilage fluid load support: functional implications for prolonged inactivity.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2020
Same journal

Injury Severity Influences Long-Term Cognitive Control in Pediatric "Mild" Traumatic Brain Injury.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Early Adulthood Signatures of Motherhood in Brain Aging.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Neural Markers of Interocular Grouping During Binocular Rivalry With MEG.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Neural Correlates of Explicit Outcome Expectation Effects: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking fMRI Denoising Pipelines.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Modeled Long-Term Effects of Psilocybin on Dynamic Activity and Effective Connectivity of Fronto-Striatal-Thalamic Circuits.

Human brain mapping·2026
See all related articles

This study presents a novel method for analyzing brain anatomy differences using spatial normalization and multivariate statistics. This approach helps identify macroscopic variations in brain morphometry across diverse populations.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Anatomical analysis
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Understanding population-specific brain anatomy is crucial for neuroscience.
  • Previous methods lacked precision in quantifying macroscopic differences.
  • Structural MRI provides detailed brain morphology data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a method for identifying macroscopic brain anatomical differences.
  • To apply spatial normalization and multivariate statistics to structural MRI data.
  • To illustrate the method by comparing male and female brain morphometry, asymmetry, and handedness effects.

Main Methods:

  • Spatially normalizing structural MRI scans to a common stereotactic space.
  • Applying multivariate statistical analysis to nonlinear deformation parameters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examining gross morphometry, brain asymmetry, and handedness effects.

    • Main Results:

    • The method successfully identified macroscopic anatomical differences.
    • Significant differences in brain morphometry were observed between sexes.
    • Brain asymmetry and handedness effects were quantifiable.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed method offers a robust approach for population-based neuroanatomical studies.
    • It enables detailed analysis of gross brain morphometry and its influencing factors.
    • This technique can advance our understanding of brain variations across different groups.