Related Experiment Videos
[Management of putaminal hemorrhage in patients with chronic renal failure]
H Tsurushima1, T Kamezaki, H Yamabe-Nakamura
1Department of Neurosurgery, Ibaraki Seinan Medical Center Hospital, Japan.
Insights
Patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) experiencing putaminal hemorrhages (PH) face higher mortality rates. Early intervention to prevent hematoma expansion may improve outcomes in these critical cases.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Neurosurgery
- Nephrology
Context:
- Putaminal hemorrhages (PH) in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) present unique treatment challenges.
- Comparison with a 1990 cooperative study reveals distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes.
Purpose:
- To evaluate treatment outcomes for PH in patients with CRF.
- To compare these outcomes with historical data from a PH cooperative study.
Summary:
- Patients with PH and CRF exhibited more severe neurological grading and larger hematoma volumes compared to the control group.
- Mortality was significantly higher (40%) in the PH with CRF group.
- Mortality rates varied by Neurological Grading (NG) and hematoma volume, with non-surgical and surgical interventions showing comparable outcomes to the cooperative study at similar severity levels.
- Functional prognosis (ADL) was better in non-surgically treated patients with less severe presentations (NG1-2).
Impact:
- The increased mortality in PH with CRF is attributed to a higher proportion of severe cases in the study cohort.
- Findings suggest that mitigating hematoma enlargement during the acute phase is crucial for improving prognosis in PH patients with CRF.
Abstract:
The treatments of putaminal hemorrhages (PH) were evaluated in 14 patients (15 hematomas) with chronic renal failure (CRF). We compared the data of our series with the data of co-operative study (1990) on PH. With regard to consciousness level (Neurological Grading, NG) and hematoma volume, significantly more serious cases were observed in PH with CRF than in PH of the co-operative study. In PH with CRF, mortality (40%) was significantly higher than that in PH of the co-operative study. However, the mortality rate was 0%, 0%, 20%, and 100% in NG1, 2, 3, and over 4b. The mortality rate was 0% in non-surgically treated cases with 0 to 30 ml of hematoma volume, and 0% in surgically treated cases with 10 to 50 ml of hematoma volume. These mortality rates were equal to those of the co-operative study with the same NG, and equal to those of the co-operative study with the same hematoma volume. With respect to functional prognosis, "good" (ADL1 and 2) resulted in 67% of non-surgically treated cases with NG1 to 2, and in 33% of surgically treated cases with NG3 to 4a. "Good" resulted in 33% of non-surgically treated cases with 0 to 30 ml of hematoma volume, and in 40% of surgically treated cases with 10 to 50 ml of hematoma volume. These morbidity rates were equal to those of the co-operative study with the same NG, and equal to those of the co-operative study with the same hematoma volume. Therefore, the high mortality in PH with CRF was suspected to be due to the fact that, in our study, there was a higher distribution of serious cases. These findings indicate that protection against enlargement of hematomas in the acute phase may bring about improvement of prognosis in PH with CRF.