Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variability of hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants

K A Gross1, C C Berndt, V J Iacono

  • 1Department of Materials Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|October 31, 1998
PubMed
Summary

This study examined the microstructure of hydroxyapatite coatings on dental implants from multiple manufacturers. Researchers found that coating crystallinity varies across implant surfaces, with amorphous regions near the metal interface and higher crystallinity toward the outer coating. Heat-exposed areas showed more crystalline structures. These findings suggest coating processes influence implant performance and may explain differences in clinical outcomes. The study highlights the need for standardized coating evaluation methods to improve implant quality and predictability.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

RF magnetron-sputtered coatings deposited from biphasic calcium phosphate targets for biomedical implant applications.

Bioactive materials·2018
Same author

In Vivo Assay of Crevicular Leukocyte Migration: Its Development and Potential Applications.

Journal of periodontology·2018
Same author

In vitro evaluation of the human gingival fibroblast/gingival mesenchymal stem cell dynamics through perforated guided tissue membranes: cell migration, proliferation and membrane stiffness assay.

Journal of periodontal research·2017
Same author

Gingival crevicular fluid vascular endothelial cell growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor-BB release profile following the use of perforated barrier membranes during treatment of intrabony defects: a randomized clinical trial.

Journal of periodontal research·2015
Same author

Morphology and gelation of thermosensitive chitosan hydrogels.

Biophysical chemistry·2005
Same author

Changes in the innate immune response of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., exposed to experimental infection with Neoparamoeba sp.

Journal of fish diseases·2005

Area of Science:

  • Dental implant surface engineering
  • Biomaterials in oral medicine
  • Medical device quality assurance

Background:

Dental implant coatings require precise control of surface properties to ensure successful osseointegration. Prior research has shown that coating uniformity and roughness influence initial implant stability. However, the role of crystallinity in hydroxyapatite coatings remains less understood. No prior work had resolved how crystalline content varies across implant surfaces. This uncertainty drove the need to examine coating microstructure systematically. Variability in coating properties may explain differences in clinical outcomes across implant types. Existing studies focus on macro-level performance metrics. This paper investigates microstructural features that could affect long-term implant success. Understanding these factors may help refine coating processes for better clinical performance.

Purpose Of The Study:

The goal was to analyze the microstructure of hydroxyapatite coatings on dental implants from multiple vendors. Researchers aimed to determine how crystallinity varies across implant surfaces. They wanted to identify patterns in coating morphology that could affect performance. The study sought to compare press-fit and screw-type implant coatings. Understanding these differences could help improve implant design and function. The research focused on chemical phase structure as a key variable. The team aimed to reveal how coating properties might influence clinical outcomes. Their work sought to provide a basis for optimizing implant surface treatments.

Keywords:
dental implant coatingshydroxyapatite crystallinityimplant surface structurecoating microstructure analysis

Frequently Asked Questions

The study found that crystalline content increases from the metal interface toward the outer coating surface.

Heat-exposed areas like the distal end showed higher crystallinity and larger crystalline regions.

Amorphous regions were predominantly found at the metal interface, suggesting process limitations.

Crystallinity may influence how implants integrate with surrounding bone tissue.

Screw-type implants showed more crystalline regions at the thread apex compared to press-fit designs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study involved obtaining implants from five commercial sources. Each implant was sectioned sagittally to expose the coating layers. Sections were mounted and polished for microscopic analysis. Surface morphology was examined using appropriate imaging techniques. Crystalline regions were quantified in terms of amount and size. The distribution of crystalline structures was mapped across the coating. Researchers compared findings between implant types and vendors. The analysis focused on phase structure and its spatial variation.

Main Results:

Coating crystallinity varied significantly between implant suppliers. Amorphous regions were most prominent near the metal interface. Crystalline content increased toward the outer coating surface. The distal end showed higher crystallinity due to heat exposure. Thread apex areas contained more crystalline structures. Larger crystalline regions were observed in heated areas. These findings suggest coating properties are not uniform across implant surfaces. The results highlight the importance of process control in coating production.

Conclusions:

The study revealed spatial variations in coating crystallinity across implant surfaces. These differences may affect how implants integrate with bone tissue. The findings suggest that coating processes influence crystallinity distribution. The results may help explain varied clinical responses to different implants. No prior work had resolved these microstructural patterns. The authors propose that process parameters affect coating quality. These observations could inform improvements in implant manufacturing. The study supports the need for standardized coating evaluation methods.

The authors suggest coating variability may explain different clinical responses to implant types.