Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

[Is today's man really less fertile?]

D Marmor¹, V Izard, D Schahmaneche

¹Unité de Médecine de la Reproduction, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris. dominique.marmor@sat.ap-hop-paris.fr

Presse Medicale (Paris, France : 1983)

|November 3, 1998

Summary

Human sperm count studies are unreliable due to flawed semen analysis techniques. Current methods lack standardization, leading to significant variations and questionable epidemiological conclusions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

X-ray tomographic measurement and modeling for inferring tungsten impurity distribution in WEST plasmas: A review.

The Review of scientific instruments·2025

Same author

Using low voltage ionization chamber (LVIC) in current mode for energy spectrum reconstruction: Experiments and validation.

The Review of scientific instruments·2022

Same author

Conceptual study of energy resolved x-ray measurement and electron temperature reconstruction on ITER with low voltage ionization chambers.

The Review of scientific instruments·2021

Same author

Modeling a low voltage ionization chamber based tomography system on ITER.

The Review of scientific instruments·2020

Same author

Incorporating magnetic equilibrium information in Gaussian process tomography for soft X-ray spectroscopy at WEST.

The Review of scientific instruments·2018

Same author

[Brief history of BPH management].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2018

Area of Science:

Reproductive biology
Environmental health
Epidemiology

Background:

A 1992 meta-analysis suggested a 40% decline in human sperm count from 1940-1990, raising fertility concerns.
This meta-analysis was later invalidated due to methodological and statistical flaws.
Environmental estrogen-mimicking chemicals were hypothesized as a cause, despite lack of evidence for declining male or mammal fertility.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the reliability of semen analysis techniques used in epidemiological studies.
To address the conflicting results and methodological biases in recent sperm count research.
To highlight the need for improved quality and standardization in semen analysis.

Main Methods:

Review and critique of existing semen analysis methodologies.
Analysis of inter-laboratory and inter-biologist variations in sperm count.
Examination of potential errors introduced by techniques, equipment, and human readers.

Main Results:

Current semen analysis techniques are subjective and lack standardized laboratory procedures and quality control.
Significant variations (exceeding 40% coefficient of variation) in sperm count can occur between technicians for the same sample.
Methodological and analytical biases are prevalent in numerous publications reporting sperm count trends.

Conclusions:

The reliability of current semen analysis techniques is insufficient to support robust epidemiological studies on sperm count.
There is a critical need to acknowledge the limitations of existing methods and implement improvements in quality and standardization.
Further research must address the inherent variability and subjectivity to ensure accurate assessment of male reproductive health trends.

Related Experiment Videos