Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

08:08
Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
Published on: April 1, 2016
Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences
H H Schilling1, K Rayner, J I Chumbley
1University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Memory & Cognition
|December 16, 1998
Summary
This study compared word recognition across naming, lexical decision, and reading tasks. Lexical decision showed a stronger word frequency effect than naming or reading, suggesting task-specific processing in word recognition.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Psycholinguistics
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Understanding word recognition is crucial for cognitive psychology and psycholinguistics.
- The word frequency effect, where more frequent words are processed faster, is a well-established phenomenon.
- Investigating this effect across different tasks provides insights into the underlying cognitive mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the word frequency effect in three distinct tasks: naming, lexical decision, and reading.
- To determine if these tasks yield consistent or divergent data regarding word recognition processes.
- To explore the relationship between the word frequency effect and response times in each task.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed three tasks: word naming, lexical decision, and reading.
- Eye fixation times on target words were measured during the reading task.
- The word frequency effect was analyzed for a common set of words across all tasks and participants.
Main Results:
- Naming and reading tasks (specifically gaze duration) showed similar word frequency effects.
- The lexical decision task exhibited a greater word frequency effect compared to naming and reading.
- A positive correlation was observed between the magnitude of the frequency effect and average response time in all tasks.
Conclusions:
- Both naming and lexical decision tasks provide valuable data on word recognition.
- The findings suggest that these tasks capture cognitive processes consistent with those observed during silent reading.
- Task-specific differences in the word frequency effect highlight variations in processing demands.

