Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Auditory and visual word processing studied with fMRI

M W Chee1, K M O'Craven, R Bergida

  • 1MGH-NMR Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown. USA. mchee@pacific.net.sg

Human Brain Mapping
|January 9, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of CBF Measured with Combined Velocity-Selective Arterial Spin-Labeling and Pulsed Arterial Spin-Labeling to Blood Flow Patterns Assessed by Conventional Angiography in Pediatric Moyamoya.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2019
Same author

Diagnostic Performance of a 10-Minute Gadolinium-Enhanced Brain MRI Protocol Compared with the Standard Clinical Protocol for Detection of Intracranial Enhancing Lesions.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2017
Same author

Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome is characterized by altered functional brain connectivity of the insular cortex: A cross-comparison with migraine and healthy adults.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2016
Same author

The imagined itch: brain circuitry supporting nocebo-induced itch in atopic dermatitis patients.

Allergy·2015
Same author

Repeatability of Standardized and Normalized Relative CBV in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2015
Same author

Comparison of CE-FDG-PET/CT with CE-FDG-PET/MR in the evaluation of osseous metastases in breast cancer patients.

British journal of cancer·2015
Same journal

Intrinsic Functional Architecture Reflects Individual Differences in Passive Working Memory: An Exploratory Resting-State fMRI Study.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Symptom Overlap and Neurobiological Similarities Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Tinnitus.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Test-Retest Reliability of Sensorimotor Activity Measured With Spinal Cord fMRI.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

The Human Visual Claustrum Responses to Physical Stimulus Properties and Subjective Content During Movie Viewing.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

miniMORPH: A Morphometry Pipeline for Low-Field MRI in Infants.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same journal

Reduced Cerebral Blood Flow in the Early Chronic Phase of Recurrent Concussion Among Female Collegiate-Aged Athletes.

Human brain mapping·2026
See all related articles

Brain regions for processing visual and auditory words overlap, particularly in frontal areas. However, auditory word processing also engages temporal and cerebellar regions not activated by visual words.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Understanding how the brain processes language is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Investigating modality-specific versus modality-independent brain regions involved in word processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare brain activations for semantic processing of visual and auditory words.
  • To identify overlapping and distinct neural substrates for different word forms.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to measure brain activity.
  • Participants performed semantic and nonsemantic tasks for both visual and auditory word stimuli.
  • Semantic tasks involved distinguishing concrete from abstract words.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both visual and auditory semantic tasks activated common regions: left inferior frontal gyrus (BA 45), bilateral anterior prefrontal cortex (BA 10, 46), and left premotor areas (BA 6, 8).
  • Auditory semantic processing additionally engaged left posterior temporal regions (middle temporal gyrus, fusiform gyrus) and the right cerebellum.
  • Nonsemantic tasks did not consistently activate language areas, and individual differences in frontal lobe activation were observed despite similar behavioral performance.

Conclusions:

  • Semantic word processing involves both shared neural networks across modalities and modality-specific regions.
  • The findings suggest that basic language processing areas are not obligatorily engaged during nonsemantic tasks.
  • Individual variability exists in neural activation patterns for semantic tasks.