Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medical confidentiality and detainees

P Schütte1

  • 1Medical Defence Union Ltd., London.

Medicine and Law
|January 29, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Doctors examining detainees face ethical conflicts between providing care and collecting forensic evidence. New UK legislation aims to prioritize medical confidentiality for detainees, resolving these complex legal and ethical duties.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preexisting conditions in pediatric ALL patients: Spectrum, frequency and clinical impact.

European journal of medical genetics·2016
Same author

Field block: an additional technique of potential value for breast surgery under general anaesthesia.

European journal of anaesthesiology·2008
Same author

[Advanced ectopic pregnancy--clinical management].

Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie·2001
Same author

[Patient self-management and stabilization as a contribution to process quality].

Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie·1999
Same author

Forensic physicians and medical confidentiality: a brief summary.

Journal of clinical forensic medicine·1995
Same author

Severity adjustment reimbursement.

Health management technology·1995

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Forensic Medicine
  • Legal Medicine

Background:

  • Physicians examining detainees may act as both treating clinicians and forensic evidence gatherers.
  • This dual role presents complex ethical and legal challenges.
  • Existing UK law requires disclosure of clinical records for legal investigations, potentially breaching confidentiality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the ethical and legal conflicts faced by doctors treating detainees in the UK.
  • To examine the tension between the duty to disclose forensic evidence and the duty of medical confidentiality.
  • To discuss the implications of a new law aimed at resolving this conflict.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of common law obligations regarding disclosure of evidence.
  • Examination of ethical guidelines from the UK's General Medical Council.
  • Review of parliamentary debates concerning new legislation.

Main Results:

  • A conflict exists between the legal obligation to disclose detainee clinical records and the ethical duty of medical confidentiality.
  • Police surgeons are routinely required to disclose full clinical records, irrespective of detainee consent.
  • Parliamentary debate indicates a move towards prioritizing medical confidentiality.

Conclusions:

  • The dual role of doctors in detainee care creates significant ethical and legal dilemmas.
  • New UK legislation is proposed to uphold medical confidentiality for detainees.
  • The resolution favors protecting patient privacy over mandatory disclosure in certain contexts.
Keywords:
Legal ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos