Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

David Moher

Showing results (281-290 of 829) with videos related to

Pageof 83
Sort By:
F1000Research|August 24, 2018
What is a predatory journal? A scoping reviewKelly D Cobey, Manoj M Lalu, Becky Skidmore, et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases|August 16, 2002
Shorter courses of parenteral antibiotic therapy do not appear to influence response rates for children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis: a systematic reviewNicole Le Saux, Andrew Howard, Nicholas J Barrowman, et al.
Plos Medicine|January 5, 2012
Disclosure of investigators' recruitment performance in multicenter clinical trials: a further step for research transparencyRafael Dal-Ré, David Moher, Christian Gluud, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 2, 2019
Contacting authors by telephone increased response proportions compared with emailing: results of a randomized studyKristin J Danko, Issa J Dahabreh, Noah M Ivers, et al.
BMC Medicine|April 28, 2010
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR NetworkIveta Simera, David Moher, Allison Hirst, et al.
Deutsches Arzteblatt International|October 1, 2013
The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline developmentJoel J Gagnier, David Riley, Douglas G Altman, et al.
BMJ Open|November 19, 2017
Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocolDavid Blanco, Jamie J Kirkham, Douglas G Altman, et al.
BMC Medicine|May 19, 2022
Data-sharing and re-analysis for main studies assessed by the European Medicines Agency-a cross-sectional study on European Public Assessment ReportsMaximilian Siebert, Jeanne Gaba, Alain Renault, et al.
BMJ Open|February 12, 2020
Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus processSamantha Cukier, Manoj Lalu, Gregory L Bryson, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|July 20, 2007
How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysisKaveh G Shojania, Margaret Sampson, Mohammed T Ansari, et al.
Pageof 83

Showing results (281-290 of 829) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 83
F1000Research|August 24, 2018
What is a predatory journal? A scoping reviewKelly D Cobey, Manoj M Lalu, Becky Skidmore, et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases|August 16, 2002
Shorter courses of parenteral antibiotic therapy do not appear to influence response rates for children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis: a systematic reviewNicole Le Saux, Andrew Howard, Nicholas J Barrowman, et al.
Plos Medicine|January 5, 2012
Disclosure of investigators' recruitment performance in multicenter clinical trials: a further step for research transparencyRafael Dal-Ré, David Moher, Christian Gluud, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 2, 2019
Contacting authors by telephone increased response proportions compared with emailing: results of a randomized studyKristin J Danko, Issa J Dahabreh, Noah M Ivers, et al.
BMC Medicine|April 28, 2010
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR NetworkIveta Simera, David Moher, Allison Hirst, et al.
Deutsches Arzteblatt International|October 1, 2013
The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline developmentJoel J Gagnier, David Riley, Douglas G Altman, et al.
BMJ Open|November 19, 2017
Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocolDavid Blanco, Jamie J Kirkham, Douglas G Altman, et al.
BMC Medicine|May 19, 2022
Data-sharing and re-analysis for main studies assessed by the European Medicines Agency-a cross-sectional study on European Public Assessment ReportsMaximilian Siebert, Jeanne Gaba, Alain Renault, et al.
BMJ Open|February 12, 2020
Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus processSamantha Cukier, Manoj Lalu, Gregory L Bryson, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|July 20, 2007
How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysisKaveh G Shojania, Margaret Sampson, Mohammed T Ansari, et al.
Pageof 83