Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Elizabeth Gialde

Showing results (1-10 of 8) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
American Heart Journal|August 10, 2016
Understanding physician-level barriers to the use of individualized risk estimates in percutaneous coronary interventionCarole Decker, Linda Garavalia, Brian Garavalia, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|March 26, 2015
Precision medicine to improve use of bleeding avoidance strategies and reduce bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: prospective cohort study before and after implementation of personalized bleeding risksJohn A Spertus, Carole Decker, Elizabeth Gialde, et al.
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes|February 16, 2019
Developing and Testing a Personalized, Evidence-Based, Shared Decision-Making Tool for Stent Selection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using a Pre-Post Study DesignAdnan K Chhatriwalla, Carole Decker, Elizabeth Gialde, et al.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology|March 19, 2013
Pre-procedural estimate of individualized bleeding risk impacts physicians' utilization of bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary interventionSeshu C Rao, Adnan K Chhatriwalla, Kevin F Kennedy, et al.
Implementation Science : IS|January 2, 2009
Implementing an innovative consent form: the PREDICT experienceCarole Decker, Suzanne V Arnold, Olawale Olabiyi, et al.
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes|October 31, 2015
Patient-Centered Decision Support in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Qualitative Study of Patients' and Providers' PerspectivesCarole Decker, Emily Chhatriwalla, Elizabeth Gialde, et al.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology|April 2, 2011
Concordance of physician ratings with the appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularizationPaul S Chan, Ralph G Brindis, David J Cohen, et al.
American Heart Journal|February 3, 2015
Improving the process of informed consent for percutaneous coronary intervention: patient outcomes from the Patient Risk Information Services Manager (ePRISM) studyJohn A Spertus, Richard Bach, Charles Bethea, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 8) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
American Heart Journal|August 10, 2016
Understanding physician-level barriers to the use of individualized risk estimates in percutaneous coronary interventionCarole Decker, Linda Garavalia, Brian Garavalia, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|March 26, 2015
Precision medicine to improve use of bleeding avoidance strategies and reduce bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: prospective cohort study before and after implementation of personalized bleeding risksJohn A Spertus, Carole Decker, Elizabeth Gialde, et al.
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes|February 16, 2019
Developing and Testing a Personalized, Evidence-Based, Shared Decision-Making Tool for Stent Selection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using a Pre-Post Study DesignAdnan K Chhatriwalla, Carole Decker, Elizabeth Gialde, et al.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology|March 19, 2013
Pre-procedural estimate of individualized bleeding risk impacts physicians' utilization of bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary interventionSeshu C Rao, Adnan K Chhatriwalla, Kevin F Kennedy, et al.
Implementation Science : IS|January 2, 2009
Implementing an innovative consent form: the PREDICT experienceCarole Decker, Suzanne V Arnold, Olawale Olabiyi, et al.
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes|October 31, 2015
Patient-Centered Decision Support in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Qualitative Study of Patients' and Providers' PerspectivesCarole Decker, Emily Chhatriwalla, Elizabeth Gialde, et al.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology|April 2, 2011
Concordance of physician ratings with the appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularizationPaul S Chan, Ralph G Brindis, David J Cohen, et al.
American Heart Journal|February 3, 2015
Improving the process of informed consent for percutaneous coronary intervention: patient outcomes from the Patient Risk Information Services Manager (ePRISM) studyJohn A Spertus, Richard Bach, Charles Bethea, et al.
Pageof 1