Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison

Showing results (41-50 of 49) with videos related to

Pageof 5
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 49 results.
Forensic Science International. Synergy|March 14, 2022
Validations of an alpha version of the E<sup>3</sup> Forensic Speech Science System (E<sup>3</sup>FS<sup>3</sup>) core software toolsPhilip Weber, Ewald Enzinger, Beltrán Labrador, et al.
Forensic Science International|October 25, 2022
Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technologyNabanita Basu, Agnes S Bali, Philip Weber, et al.
Forensic Science International|May 11, 2024
Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part III: Groups of collaborating listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technologyAgnes S Bali, Nabanita Basu, Philip Weber, et al.
Forensic Science International|July 1, 2023
Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part II: Investigation of bias in individual listeners' responsesNabanita Basu, Philip Weber, Agnes S Bali, et al.
Forensic Science International. Synergy|February 3, 2022
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development processGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Cedric Neumann, Patrick Henry Geoghegan, et al.
Forensic Science International. Synergy|June 1, 2022
A strawman with machine learning for a brain: A response to Biedermann (2022) the strange persistence of (source) "identification" claims in forensic literatureGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Daniel Ramos, Rolf Jf Ypma, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|May 14, 2021
Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparisonGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Ewald Enzinger, Vincent Hughes, et al.
Forensic Science International|November 8, 2016
A comment on the PCAST report: Skip the "match"/"non-match" stageGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, David H Kaye, David J Balding, et al.
Forensic Science International|August 13, 2025
A response to EA-4/23 INF:2025 "The Assessment and Accreditation of Opinions and Interpretations using ISO/IEC 17025:2017"Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Alex Biedermann, Matt Tart, et al.
Pageof 5

Showing results (41-50 of 49) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 5
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 49 results.
Forensic Science International. Synergy|March 14, 2022
Validations of an alpha version of the E<sup>3</sup> Forensic Speech Science System (E<sup>3</sup>FS<sup>3</sup>) core software toolsPhilip Weber, Ewald Enzinger, Beltrán Labrador, et al.
Forensic Science International|October 25, 2022
Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part I: Individual listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technologyNabanita Basu, Agnes S Bali, Philip Weber, et al.
Forensic Science International|May 11, 2024
Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part III: Groups of collaborating listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technologyAgnes S Bali, Nabanita Basu, Philip Weber, et al.
Forensic Science International|July 1, 2023
Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part II: Investigation of bias in individual listeners' responsesNabanita Basu, Philip Weber, Agnes S Bali, et al.
Forensic Science International. Synergy|February 3, 2022
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development processGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Cedric Neumann, Patrick Henry Geoghegan, et al.
Forensic Science International. Synergy|June 1, 2022
A strawman with machine learning for a brain: A response to Biedermann (2022) the strange persistence of (source) "identification" claims in forensic literatureGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Daniel Ramos, Rolf Jf Ypma, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|May 14, 2021
Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparisonGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Ewald Enzinger, Vincent Hughes, et al.
Forensic Science International|November 8, 2016
A comment on the PCAST report: Skip the "match"/"non-match" stageGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, David H Kaye, David J Balding, et al.
Forensic Science International|August 13, 2025
A response to EA-4/23 INF:2025 "The Assessment and Accreditation of Opinions and Interpretations using ISO/IEC 17025:2017"Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Alex Biedermann, Matt Tart, et al.
Pageof 5