Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Karin Leifland

Showing results (1-10 of 21) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Nursing Open|May 31, 2023
Breast cancer screening and immigrant women-A scoping review of attendance, knowledge, barriers and facilitatorsHanna Dumky, Kent Fridell, Karin Leifland, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|August 10, 2016
Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening programBrigitte Wilczek, Henryk E Wilczek, Lawrence Rasouliyan, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|February 3, 2018
A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over timeMikael Eriksson, Jingmei Li, Karin Leifland, et al.
Lakartidningen|February 22, 2017
[Mammography, ultrasound and needle biopsy is the base for diagnostic imaging]Sophia Zackrisson, Kristina Lång, Karin Leifland, et al.
Breast Cancer Research : BCR|March 15, 2017
A clinical model for identifying the short-term risk of breast cancerMikael Eriksson, Kamila Czene, Yudi Pawitan, et al.
Radiology|January 26, 2012
Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer studyMatthew G Wallis, Elin Moa, Federica Zanca, et al.
Medical Physics|April 6, 2013
Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammogramsGuido van Schie, Matthew G Wallis, Karin Leifland, et al.
Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)|August 28, 2016
Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screeningRoxanna Hellgren, Paul Dickman, Karin Leifland, et al.
Gynecological Endocrinology : the Official Journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology|July 28, 2012
Percutaneous estradiol/oral micronized progesterone has less-adverse effects and different gene regulations than oral conjugated equine estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate in the breasts of healthy women in vivoDaniel Murkes, P G L Lalitkumar, Karin Leifland, et al.
Fertility and Sterility|November 12, 2010
Effects of percutaneous estradiol-oral progesterone versus oral conjugated equine estrogens-medroxyprogesterone acetate on breast cell proliferation and bcl-2 protein in healthy womenDaniel Murkes, Peter Conner, Karin Leifland, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (1-10 of 21) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Nursing Open|May 31, 2023
Breast cancer screening and immigrant women-A scoping review of attendance, knowledge, barriers and facilitatorsHanna Dumky, Kent Fridell, Karin Leifland, et al.
European Journal of Radiology|August 10, 2016
Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening programBrigitte Wilczek, Henryk E Wilczek, Lawrence Rasouliyan, et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|February 3, 2018
A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over timeMikael Eriksson, Jingmei Li, Karin Leifland, et al.
Lakartidningen|February 22, 2017
[Mammography, ultrasound and needle biopsy is the base for diagnostic imaging]Sophia Zackrisson, Kristina Lång, Karin Leifland, et al.
Breast Cancer Research : BCR|March 15, 2017
A clinical model for identifying the short-term risk of breast cancerMikael Eriksson, Kamila Czene, Yudi Pawitan, et al.
Radiology|January 26, 2012
Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer studyMatthew G Wallis, Elin Moa, Federica Zanca, et al.
Medical Physics|April 6, 2013
Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammogramsGuido van Schie, Matthew G Wallis, Karin Leifland, et al.
Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)|August 28, 2016
Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screeningRoxanna Hellgren, Paul Dickman, Karin Leifland, et al.
Gynecological Endocrinology : the Official Journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology|July 28, 2012
Percutaneous estradiol/oral micronized progesterone has less-adverse effects and different gene regulations than oral conjugated equine estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate in the breasts of healthy women in vivoDaniel Murkes, P G L Lalitkumar, Karin Leifland, et al.
Fertility and Sterility|November 12, 2010
Effects of percutaneous estradiol-oral progesterone versus oral conjugated equine estrogens-medroxyprogesterone acetate on breast cell proliferation and bcl-2 protein in healthy womenDaniel Murkes, Peter Conner, Karin Leifland, et al.
Pageof 3