Showing results (1-10 of 520) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 52
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|December 21, 2017
Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older searchKatharina Allers, Falk Hoffmann, Tim Mathes, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 2, 2019
Comparison of non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their published protocols: differences occurred frequently but were seldom explainedNadja Koensgen, Tanja Rombey, Katharina Allers, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|August 20, 2022
Restrictions and their reporting in systematic reviews of effectiveness: an observational studyJasmin Helbach, Dawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|June 6, 2021
Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019Falk Hoffmann, Katharina Allers, Tanja Rombey, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|December 30, 2022
Reporting according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for abstracts (PRISMA-A) depends on abstract lengthJasmin Helbach, Falk Hoffmann, Dawid Pieper, et al.
Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen|December 13, 2016
[How do authors of systematic reviews restrict their literature searches when only studies from Germany should be included?]Dawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, Rebecca Palm, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|December 7, 2019
An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and cumulative incidenceFalk Hoffmann, Daniela Eggers, Dawid Pieper, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|October 8, 2019
More systematic reviews were registered in PROSPERO each year, but few records' status was up-to-dateTanja Rombey, Katharina Doni, Falk Hoffmann, et al.
Pageof 52