Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Martin R Vasilev

Showing results (1-10 of 27) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|September 1, 2016
Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysisMartin R Vasilev, Bernhard Angele
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics|June 6, 2019
An eye-movement exploration into return-sweep targeting during readingTimothy J Slattery, Martin R Vasilev
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|July 27, 2025
Are the differences between intra-line and return-sweep fixation durations driven by linguistic, oculomotor, or visual processing? A comparison of eye movements during reading and z-string scanningAdam J Parker, Muchan Tao, Martin R Vasilev
Journal of Cognition|November 22, 2019
Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished LiteratureMartin R Vasilev, Mark Yates, Timothy J Slattery
Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science|June 30, 2018
Auditory Distraction During Reading: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of a Continuing ControversyMartin R Vasilev, Julie A Kirkby, Bernhard Angele
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|October 23, 2018
Surprise as an explanation to auditory novelty distraction and post-error slowingFabrice B R Parmentier, Martin R Vasilev, Pilar Andrés
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)|December 7, 2020
Distraction by auditory novelty during reading: Evidence for disruption in saccade planning, but not saccade executionMartin R Vasilev, Fabrice Br Parmentier, Julie A Kirkby
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)|September 29, 2020
Parafoveal degradation during reading reduces preview costs only when it is not perceptually distinctMartin R Vasilev, Mark Yates, Ethan Prueitt, et al.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)|December 7, 2018
Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement studyMartin R Vasilev, Fabrice Br Parmentier, Bernhard Angele, et al.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition|June 30, 2017
What are the costs of degraded parafoveal previews during silent reading?Martin R Vasilev, Timothy J Slattery, Julie A Kirkby, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (1-10 of 27) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|September 1, 2016
Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysisMartin R Vasilev, Bernhard Angele
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics|June 6, 2019
An eye-movement exploration into return-sweep targeting during readingTimothy J Slattery, Martin R Vasilev
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review|July 27, 2025
Are the differences between intra-line and return-sweep fixation durations driven by linguistic, oculomotor, or visual processing? A comparison of eye movements during reading and z-string scanningAdam J Parker, Muchan Tao, Martin R Vasilev
Journal of Cognition|November 22, 2019
Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished LiteratureMartin R Vasilev, Mark Yates, Timothy J Slattery
Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science|June 30, 2018
Auditory Distraction During Reading: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of a Continuing ControversyMartin R Vasilev, Julie A Kirkby, Bernhard Angele
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General|October 23, 2018
Surprise as an explanation to auditory novelty distraction and post-error slowingFabrice B R Parmentier, Martin R Vasilev, Pilar Andrés
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)|December 7, 2020
Distraction by auditory novelty during reading: Evidence for disruption in saccade planning, but not saccade executionMartin R Vasilev, Fabrice Br Parmentier, Julie A Kirkby
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)|September 29, 2020
Parafoveal degradation during reading reduces preview costs only when it is not perceptually distinctMartin R Vasilev, Mark Yates, Ethan Prueitt, et al.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)|December 7, 2018
Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement studyMartin R Vasilev, Fabrice Br Parmentier, Bernhard Angele, et al.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition|June 30, 2017
What are the costs of degraded parafoveal previews during silent reading?Martin R Vasilev, Timothy J Slattery, Julie A Kirkby, et al.
Pageof 3