Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

R Austin Hicklin

Showing results (11-20 of 25) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Forensic Science International|March 22, 2017
Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinationsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Plos One|March 20, 2012
Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examinersBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, JoAnn Buscaglia, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|October 4, 2014
In response to Haber and Haber, "Experimental results of fingerprint comparison validity and reliability: A review and critical analysis"R Austin Hicklin, Bradford T Ulery, JoAnn Buscaglia, et al.
Forensic Science International|August 8, 2025
Author response to Commentary on "Accuracy and reproducibility of bullet comparison decisions by forensic examiners"R Austin Hicklin, Nicole Richetelli, Melissa Taylor, et al.
Plos One|May 24, 2021
Characterizing missed identifications and errors in latent fingerprint comparisons using eye-tracking dataThomas A Busey, Nicholas Heise, R Austin Hicklin, et al.
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications|April 7, 2019
Gaze behavior and cognitive states during fingerprint target group localizationR Austin Hicklin, Bradford T Ulery, Thomas A Busey, et al.
Forensic Science International|February 12, 2013
Understanding the sufficiency of information for latent fingerprint value determinationsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, George I Kiebuzinski, et al.
Data in Brief|May 2, 2023
DNAmix 2021: Laboratory policies, procedures, and casework scenarios summary and datasetLauren M Brinkac, Nicole Richetelli, Jonathon M Davoren, et al.
Forensic Science International. Genetics|June 2, 2023
Variation in assessments of suitability and number of contributors for DNA mixturesR Austin Hicklin, Nicole Richetelli, Brandi L Emerick, et al.
Forensic Science International|April 6, 2024
Accuracy and reproducibility of forensic tire examination decisionsNicole Richetelli, Jan LeMay, Kensley M Dunagan, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (11-20 of 25) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Forensic Science International|March 22, 2017
Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinationsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, Maria Antonia Roberts, et al.
Plos One|March 20, 2012
Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examinersBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, JoAnn Buscaglia, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|October 4, 2014
In response to Haber and Haber, "Experimental results of fingerprint comparison validity and reliability: A review and critical analysis"R Austin Hicklin, Bradford T Ulery, JoAnn Buscaglia, et al.
Forensic Science International|August 8, 2025
Author response to Commentary on "Accuracy and reproducibility of bullet comparison decisions by forensic examiners"R Austin Hicklin, Nicole Richetelli, Melissa Taylor, et al.
Plos One|May 24, 2021
Characterizing missed identifications and errors in latent fingerprint comparisons using eye-tracking dataThomas A Busey, Nicholas Heise, R Austin Hicklin, et al.
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications|April 7, 2019
Gaze behavior and cognitive states during fingerprint target group localizationR Austin Hicklin, Bradford T Ulery, Thomas A Busey, et al.
Forensic Science International|February 12, 2013
Understanding the sufficiency of information for latent fingerprint value determinationsBradford T Ulery, R Austin Hicklin, George I Kiebuzinski, et al.
Data in Brief|May 2, 2023
DNAmix 2021: Laboratory policies, procedures, and casework scenarios summary and datasetLauren M Brinkac, Nicole Richetelli, Jonathon M Davoren, et al.
Forensic Science International. Genetics|June 2, 2023
Variation in assessments of suitability and number of contributors for DNA mixturesR Austin Hicklin, Nicole Richetelli, Brandi L Emerick, et al.
Forensic Science International|April 6, 2024
Accuracy and reproducibility of forensic tire examination decisionsNicole Richetelli, Jan LeMay, Kensley M Dunagan, et al.
Pageof 3