Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

William C Thompson

Showing results (21-30 of 28) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 28 results.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|October 28, 2024
Incorrect statistical reasoning in Guyll et al. leads to biased claims about strength of forensic evidenceMichael Rosenblum, Elizabeth T Chin, Elizabeth L Ogburn, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|December 16, 2014
Regarding Champod, editorial: "Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science"D Michael Risinger, William C Thompson, Allan Jamieson, et al.
Forensic Science International. Synergy|February 3, 2022
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development processGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Cedric Neumann, Patrick Henry Geoghegan, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|April 24, 2010
Commentary on: Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG, Fram R, Harrison D, Meagher S, Oien CT, Peterson PE, Seiger DP,Smith MB, Smrz MA, Soltis GL, Stacey RB. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):798-809Dan E Krane, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|July 22, 2008
Sequential unmasking: a means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretationDan E Krane, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|May 14, 2021
Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparisonGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Ewald Enzinger, Vincent Hughes, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|February 24, 2011
Commentary on: Thornton JI. Letter to the editor--aa rejection of "working blind" as a cure for contextual bias. J Forensic Sci 2010;55(6):1663William C Thompson, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Journal of Law and the Biosciences|August 31, 2017
Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claimsMichael J Saks, Thomas Albright, Thomas L Bohan, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (21-30 of 28) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
You have reached the last page of results.This site can display upto 28 results.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|October 28, 2024
Incorrect statistical reasoning in Guyll et al. leads to biased claims about strength of forensic evidenceMichael Rosenblum, Elizabeth T Chin, Elizabeth L Ogburn, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|December 16, 2014
Regarding Champod, editorial: "Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science"D Michael Risinger, William C Thompson, Allan Jamieson, et al.
Forensic Science International. Synergy|February 3, 2022
Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development processGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Cedric Neumann, Patrick Henry Geoghegan, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|April 24, 2010
Commentary on: Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG, Fram R, Harrison D, Meagher S, Oien CT, Peterson PE, Seiger DP,Smith MB, Smrz MA, Soltis GL, Stacey RB. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):798-809Dan E Krane, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|July 22, 2008
Sequential unmasking: a means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretationDan E Krane, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|May 14, 2021
Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparisonGeoffrey Stewart Morrison, Ewald Enzinger, Vincent Hughes, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|February 24, 2011
Commentary on: Thornton JI. Letter to the editor--aa rejection of "working blind" as a cure for contextual bias. J Forensic Sci 2010;55(6):1663William C Thompson, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Journal of Law and the Biosciences|August 31, 2017
Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claimsMichael J Saks, Thomas Albright, Thomas L Bohan, et al.
Pageof 3