Interferences in hormone immunoassays

George G Klee1

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. klee.george@mayo.edu

Insights

Immunoassays are robust, but interference can occur. Laboratories rely on clinician communication and specific tests to investigate potential immunoassay interference and ensure accurate results.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Immunoassays are widely used for diagnostic testing.
  • Potential interferences can compromise immunoassay accuracy.
  • Identifying interference before testing is not feasible.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss common causes of immunoassay interference.
  • To outline strategies for investigating suspected interference.
  • To highlight the importance of laboratory-clinician communication.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common immunoassay interference types (cross-reactivity, heterophile antibodies).
  • Description of investigative techniques: dilutional linearity, spiked recovery, heterophile antibody blocking, alternate technology testing.
  • Emphasis on post-analytical investigation triggered by clinical suspicion.

Main Results:

  • Competitive immunoassays are prone to cross-reactivity.
  • Immunometric assays frequently encounter heterophile antibody interference.
  • Investigative methods can help identify and confirm assay interference.

Conclusions:

  • Immunoassays are generally reliable measurement systems.
  • Laboratories must depend on clinicians to flag potentially erroneous results due to interference.
  • Systematic investigation protocols are essential for managing immunoassay interference.