Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Cell Block Preparation from Cytology Specimen with Predominance of Individually Scattered Cells
Published on: July 21, 2009
Immunocytochemical staining of serous effusions: an additional method in the routine cytology practice?
1Department of Pathology, Aalborg Hospital, Denmark.
Insights
Immunocytochemistry using Ber-EP4 and EMA aids in diagnosing malignant serous effusions. This method, when combined with cytomorphology, improves cancer detection but requires careful interpretation to avoid false positives.
Area of Science:
- Cytopathology
- Immunocytochemistry
- Oncology
Background:
- Serous fluid analysis is crucial for diagnosing various conditions, including malignancy.
- Traditional cytomorphology can sometimes be insufficient for definitive diagnosis in serous effusions.
- Immunocytochemistry offers potential for improved diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of a panel of antibodies, specifically Ber-EP4 and EMA, in differentiating benign from malignant cells in serous fluids.
- To assess the impact of immunocytochemistry on the detection rate of malignant cases in serous effusions.
- To establish reliable immunocytochemical staining profiles for accurate diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 100 serous fluid samples.
- Cytomorphologic analysis combined with immunocytochemistry using a panel of antibodies, including Ber-EP4 and Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA).
- Classification of staining patterns into benign and malignant profiles.
Main Results:
- Three distinct immunocytochemical staining profiles were identified: benign (negative for Ber-EP4/CEA), malignant epithelial (Ber-EP4 and EMA positive), and malignant mesothelial (EMA positive).
- Application of these profiles increased the recognition of malignant cases from 19 to 38.
- Two cases showed a false-positive malignant epithelial profile, highlighting the need for correlation with other data.
Conclusions:
- Immunocytochemistry with anti-Ber-EP4 and anti-EMA is a valuable addition to routine cytomorphologic analysis of serous fluids.
- This approach significantly enhances the detection of malignancy in serous effusions.
- Results must be correlated with cytomorphology, histology, and clinical information for accurate interpretation and to mitigate false positives.
Abstract:
In a consecutive and prospective cytomorphologic and immunocytochemical study we have examined 100 serous fluids with a panel of antibodies. Three different immunocytochemical patterns of staining were recognized: (i) a benign profile showing no Ber-EP4 or CEA-positive cells; (ii) a malignant profile with Ber-EP4 and strongly EMA-positive epithelial cells; and (iii) a malignant profile in which mesothelial cells were strongly positive for EMA. By applying these profiles the number of malignant cases recognized increased from 19 to 38. All cytomorphologic malignant fluids showed a malignant profile, but in two cases a malignant epithelial profile was found in patients without otherwise proven malignant disease (false positive staining). Immunocytochemistry with anti-Ber-EP4 and anti-EMA can be recommended as a routine procedure, but the marker result should always be correlated with cytomorphology, eventual histologic data and clinical records.
Related Concept Videos
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
The...
Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry
These...
Immunogold Electron Microscopy

