Neuroimmunomodulation: classical and non-classical cellular activation
1Department of Pathology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Neuropeptides like substance P can uniquely influence immune cells, showing dual roles in enhancing or inhibiting functions. Understanding these differential responses in homogeneous cell populations is key to neuroimmunology research.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimmunology
- Cellular immunology
- Neuropeptide signaling
Background:
- Immune and inflammatory cell functions can be enhanced or inhibited by certain substances, a duality not fully explained by dose or heterogeneous cell populations.
- Neuropeptides such as somatostatin (SOM) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) exhibit variable effects on cell proliferation, immunoglobulin synthesis, and NK activity depending on experimental conditions.
- Substance P (SP), typically a lymphocyte stimulant, can paradoxically inhibit activity under specific circumstances, leading to discrepancies in research findings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explain the discrepancies in neuropeptide effects on immune cells.
- To focus on the differential cellular responses to substance P (SP).
- To illustrate the mechanisms behind these varied responses.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of existing physiological data on SP effects on cell function.
- Synopsis of SP receptor mechanisms on effector cells.
- Examination of SP-activated secondary messenger systems.
Main Results:
- Differential responses to the same neuropeptide can occur within homogeneous cell populations across a range of concentrations.
- Experimental conditions and species differences contribute to apparent discrepancies in neuro-immune interaction studies.
- Reproducibility is high within the same laboratory under controlled conditions.
Conclusions:
- The complex effects of neuropeptides like SP on immune cells are concentration-dependent and cell-specific.
- Understanding receptor mechanisms and secondary messenger pathways is crucial for elucidating neuro-immune interactions.
- Standardized experimental conditions are vital for resolving discrepancies and understanding the physiological roles of neuro-immune signaling.
Abstract:
As neuroimmunologists, we are often faced with the fact that some substances can either enhance or inhibit particular immune/inflammatory cell functions. This 'duality' could only partially be explained by dose-dependency and the fact that in a variety of systems, heterogenous cell populations are commonly used. For example it has been repetitively shown that cell proliferation, immunoglobulin synthesis and NK (natural killer) activity could be enhanced, inhibited or not affected at all by such neuropeptides as somatostatin (SOM) or vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), depending on the experimental conditions. Even substance P (SP), which, in general, stimulates lymphocyte activity, can, under certain conditions, possess an inhibitory activity. These apparent discrepancies between various groups and experimental conditions met with a strong reservation among 'classical' immunologists as they questioned the true physiological role that neuro-immune interactions play in normal and disease states. However, upon a detailed analysis of the data, it become obvious why such discrepancies abounded. Not only are we comparing totally different responses in different species, but almost always we compare different experimental conditions. In lieu of this, the reproducibility of the experiments within the same laboratory is in fact very high. One fundamental and striking observation is the fact that at the level of a homogeneous cell population, a differential response could be evoked by the same neuropeptide over a range of concentrations. For the purpose of this brief report we will focus on the cellular responses to the neuropeptide substance P and we will try to illustrate why such differential responses are possible. Some of the physiological data relating to the effects of SP on cell function will be discussed. This will be followed by a synopsis of SP receptor mechanisms on effector cells and finally the mechanism by which SP activates secondary messenger systems in these cells.
More Related Videos
09:38Determining Immune System Suppression versus CNS Protection for Pharmacological Interventions in Autoimmune Demyelination
Published on: September 12, 2016
06:43Increased Recovery Time and Decreased LPS Administration to Study the Vagus Nerve Stimulation Mechanisms in Limited Inflammatory Responses
Published on: March 29, 2017
Related Concept Videos
01:40Cell-mediated Immune Responses
01:28Cells of the Innate Immune Response
Phagocytes
Phagocytes police the peripheral tissues by removing cellular debris and responding to the invasion of foreign substances or pathogens. Many phagocytes attack and remove microorganisms even before lymphocytes detect them. The human body has two general...
01:22T Cell Activation and Clonal Selection
Naive T cells that have not yet encountered an antigen express two primary CD...
01:24T Cell Types and Functions
Th1 cells stimulate dendritic cells to express necessary co-stimulatory molecules on their surfaces for...
01:27Cytotoxic T Cells-mediated Immune Response
Immunological surveillance is the ability of immune cells to monitor and eliminate infected cells with intracellular pathogens, neoplastically transformed cells, and cells with non-self antigens. Cytotoxic T cells and NK...
01:24B Cell Activation and Differentiation
When naive B cells encounter a specific antigen that can bind to the B cell receptor (BCR) on their surface, they undergo sensitization to respond to the antigen's presence. Sensitization begins with...