Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

102
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
102
Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

5.2K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
5.2K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

130
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
130
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

287
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
287
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

7.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
7.7K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Purchasing Versus Providing Care at the VHA: Quality Differences in Follow-Up After Psychiatric Hospitalization.

Medical care·2025
Same author

The Dynamics of Mood in Bipolar Disorder: How Mathematical Models Help Phenotype Individuals, Forecast Mood, and Clarify Underlying Mechanisms.

Current psychiatry reports·2025
Same author

The Unreliability of Two Publicly Reported Outcome Quality Measures for Characterizing Health Care Quality Within the Veterans Health Administration.

Health services research·2025
Same author

Evaluation of falls detected by natural language processing algorithm and not coded external cause of morbidity.

JAMIA open·2025
Same author

Legal-involved veterans are less likely to receive guideline-concordant colorectal cancer screening.

BMC health services research·2025
Same author

Preadolescent externalizing and internalizing symptoms are differentially related to drift-diffusion model parameters and neural activation during a go/no-go task.

Journal of psychiatric research·2024
Same journal

Integrating health economics and implementation science: a call to action.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Methods for incorporating test result information within the high-dimensional propensity score framework: application in UK electronic health record data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Sparse multi-way DMDC for longitudinal classification in high dimension low sample size data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Tree-based exploratory identification of predictive biomarkers in non-randomized data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Comparative evaluation of interrupted time series analytical methods for healthcare quality improvement research: a Monte Carlo simulation study.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Methodological advances in claims-based dementia algorithms: integrating medication and clinical data for medicare populations.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

量化和减少平均治疗效应估计中的不平等.

Kenneth J Nieser1, Amy L Cochran2,3

  • 1Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.

BMC medical research methodology
|December 15, 2023
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

这项研究引入了一种新方法,以解决研究样本中代表性不足的问题,改善所有组的平均治疗效果估计. 这种方法减少了错误,特别是对于较小的子组,提高了概括性.

关键词:
平均治疗效果 平均治疗效果样本的代表性 样本的代表性小组分析小组分析小组分析

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

544
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

544
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.4K

科学领域:

  • 统计 统计 统计 统计
  • 健康 公平 卫生 公平
  • 流行病学 流行病学

背景情况:

  • 跨研究样本代表性的系统差异可能导致平均治疗效应的不公平概括.
  • 代表性不足的子组可能会经历偏见或不太可靠的治疗效果估计.

研究的目的:

  • 开发一个框架来量化在研究中的代表不平等.
  • 提出一种数据分析方法,以减轻样本代表性的差异.
  • 提高平均治疗效应 (ATE) 估计的概括性和公平性.

主要方法:

  • 开发了一个框架来量化来自样本代表性差异的不平等.
  • 建议在代表性调整的样本中估计ATE的方法,允许子组利用完整的样本数据.
  • 提供了两种代表性调整方法:最小化子组平均平方误差 (MSE) 和平衡具有平等代表性的MSE.
  • 进行模拟研究,将拟议估计器与子组特定估计器进行比较.

主要成果:

  • 与现有方法相比,提出的估计器显示了较低的平均平方误差 (MSE).
  • 这种改善对于较小,代表性不足的子组来说尤为显著.
  • 一个案例研究将该方法应用于已发表的子组分析,验证了其实际实用性.

结论:

  • 提出的估计器有效地减轻了代表差异对ATE估计的影响.
  • 虽然统计方法可以有所帮助,但真正的公平性最终需要根本的结构性变化.
  • 建议采用这些估计器来提高研究公平性和减少偏见.