Jove
Visualize
联系我们

相关概念视频

Bias01:22

Bias

4.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.2K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

265
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
265
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data01:11

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data

32.7K
A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
32.7K
Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

23.7K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
23.7K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Symmetry in category systems across languages.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A computational analysis of lexical elaboration across languages.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Word reuse and combination support efficient communication of emerging concepts.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

A Computational Approach to Identifying Cultural Keywords Across Languages.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

Visual Perception Principles in Constellation Creation.

Topics in cognitive science·2024
Same author

Simplification Is Not Dominant in the Evolution of Chinese Characters.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2023
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.3K

在等级类别系统中量化偏差.

Katie Warburton1,2, Charles Kemp1, Yang Xu2,3

  • 1School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science
|March 4, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

本研究介绍了在等级类别系统中测量偏差的方法. 图书馆分类系统显示出明显的西方偏见和性别偏见,杜威十进制分类表现出比国会图书馆分类更大的偏见.

关键词:
偏见 偏见 偏见 偏见 偏见分类分类的分类.性别偏见是性别偏见.图书馆分类系统是图书馆的分类系统.西方偏见是西方人的偏见.

更多相关视频

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.8K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.5K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.8K

科学领域:

  • 认知科学 认知科学
  • 信息科学 信息科学 信息科学
  • 社会学 社会学 社会学

背景情况:

  • 分类是人类认知和社会结构的基础.
  • 类别系统是不客观的,可以延续有害的偏见.
  • 在图书馆中常见的等级类别系统需要偏差评估的方法.

研究的目的:

  • 提出和展示在等级类别系统中量化偏差的方法.
  • 分析图书馆分类系统中的偏见,特别关注西方概念和男性作者.
  • 为了比较杜威十进制分类和国会图书馆分类之间的偏差水平.

主要方法:

  • 开发新的方法来衡量层次类别结构中的偏见.
  • 分析了一个大规模的图书馆数据集,包括300多万本书.
  • 在宗教,文学和历史类别中对西方偏见的定量评估,以及作者性别分布.

主要成果:

  • 图书馆分类系统表现出西方的重大偏见,特别是在宗教类别.
  • 男性作家的书籍在各个类别中比女性作家的书籍更广泛地分布.
  • 与国会图书馆分类相比,杜威十进制分类表现出更高程度的偏差.

结论:

  • 提出的方法有效量化层次类别系统中的偏差.
  • 图书馆分类系统反映并可以放大与文化和性别有关的社会偏见.
  • 开发的方法适用于图书馆以外的各种自然和机构类别系统.