Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Blinding01:11

Blinding

3.8K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
3.8K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

12.8K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.8K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

382
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
382
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.4K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.4K
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

370
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
370
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

135
Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
135

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Evaluation of tools to assess decision-making capacity in minor adolescents in clinical settings: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.

BMC medical ethics·2026
Same author

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) in society. Healthcare providers and researchers' views on the public health and socio-cultural implications of PRS in healthcare contexts.

Journal of community genetics·2026
Same author

Polygenic risk scores in health care contexts: Expanding roles, redrawing boundaries?

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same author

To be or not to be value-free? A tension in the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.

Accountability in research·2026
Same author

Understanding of Authorship Guidelines and the Frequency of Authorship Misuse: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study in the State of Qatar.

Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE·2025
Same author

Polygenic risk scores in healthcare contexts: what's the scope? An interview study of European healthcare providers and researchers' perspectives on ethical challenges.

Human genetics·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Mouse Eye Enucleation for Remote High-throughput Phenotyping
05:30

Mouse Eye Enucleation for Remote High-throughput Phenotyping

Published on: November 19, 2011

21.0K

在生物医学提案同行评审中重新思考 (解) 失明:一个多利益相关者定性研究.

Seba Qussini1,2, Farizah Mezer Anami2, Kris Dierickx1

  • 1Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Accountability in research
|December 7, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

利益相关者希望在赠款融资方面有更多的透明度. 开放的同行审查 (OPR) 提供了一条可行的途径,以加强提案审查中的问责制,尽管偏好盲目的系统.

关键词:
(没有) 失明.建议 同行评审.进行公开的同行评审.开放科学运动是开放科学运动.定性研究是指质量研究.

更多相关视频

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K
Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure
05:34

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Published on: December 13, 2024

1.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Mouse Eye Enucleation for Remote High-throughput Phenotyping
05:30

Mouse Eye Enucleation for Remote High-throughput Phenotyping

Published on: November 19, 2011

21.0K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K
Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure
05:34

Operating and Biocontainment Procedures of a Facility for Laboratory Mice with a Natural Microbiome: Immunophenotyping Procedure

Published on: December 13, 2024

1.0K

科学领域:

  • 资助生物医学研究的资金.
  • 资助提案评价 资助提案评价
  • 科学的同行评审是科学的.

背景情况:

  • 对赠款提案的同行评审过程面临批评,需要进一步调查.
  • 研究了利益相关者对生物医学提案中审查员盲目和公开同行评审 (OPR) 的看法.

研究的目的:

  • 调查利益相关者的观点,审查员盲目在赠款提案的同行评审.
  • 评估公开同行评审 (OPR) 对生物医学资助提案的影响.

主要方法:

  • 一项使用半结构面试的定性描述性研究,对来自比利时和卡塔尔资助机构的23名参与者进行了半结构面试.
  • 主题框架分析指导了对转录的访谈的审查,并补充了对同行评审陈述的定量评级.

主要成果:

  • 出现了三个关键主题:优先考虑资金分配的透明度,同时保护审查员的匿名性.
  • 开放的同行审查 (OPR) 被认为是提高提案审查透明度和问责制的实际方法.
  • 对传统的同行评审系统的批判性观点在利益相关者中越来越明显.

结论:

  • 尽管人们更喜欢双盲审查,但其局限性是显而易见的,尤其是在资金挑战的情况下.
  • 在对赠款提案和资金分配流程的同行评审中,人们认识到需要提高开放性和透明度.