偶然错误及其对测试变量之间的关系及其对复合测量结果的影响
Paul De Boeck1, Michael L DeKay1, Jolynn Pek1
1The Ohio State University.
Psychometrika
|February 25, 2026
概括
随机错误通过承认观察到的数据中的随机扭曲来解释近似的模型匹配. 这个概念影响了统计能力和测量不确定性,为理解研究变化提供了一个框架.
科学领域:
- 统计 统计 统计 统计
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
- 数据分析 数据分析
背景情况:
- 由Wu & Browne (2015) 介绍的,偶然错误地址大致适合于共变性结构模型 (CSM).
- 它假定观察到的数据矩阵因实现差异而随机地与理论矩阵扭曲.
- 这种扭曲会影响统计推断的准确性.
研究的目的:
- 将偶然错误的概念推广到CSM之外.
- 为了说明其对标准误差,效果大小,统计能力和测量不确定性的影响.
- 为理解研究变异性提供统计框架.
主要方法:
- 使用模拟来证明偶然错误对对对关系中的标准错误的影响.
- 为了探索偶然错误,效果大小异质性和统计功率高估之间的联系,使用了导数.
- 进一步的模拟评估了偶然错误对复合分数的影响,如因数和总分数.
主要成果:
- 偶然错误对标准错误的影响扩展到CSM之外的对变量关系.
- 偶然的错误可能解释了研究中的效应大小的异质性和统计能力的高估.
- 综合分数对测量不确定性的影响很小,但因子分数比总分数更大.
结论:
- 偶然错误为理解近似合适,研究发现变性和功率高估提供了一个统计框架.
- 它强调了在统计建模中考虑数据生成机制的重要性.
- 这些发现对解释研究结果和设计未来研究有影响.
相关概念视频
Random and Systematic Errors
15.5K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
15.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
111.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
111.6K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
11.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.6K
Random Error
9.9K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.9K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
634
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
634


